Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:07:01.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of photoperiod and temperature on vegetative growth and development of Florida betony (Stachys floridana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Scott McElroy ,
Fred H. Yelverton ,
Joseph C. Neal  and
Thomas W. Rufty Jr.
Fred H. Yelverton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Joseph C. Neal
Affiliation:
Horticultural Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Thomas W. Rufty Jr.
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in environmental chambers to the evaluate effects of photoperiod and temperature on Florida betony growth and development. Plants were exposed to two photoperiods, short day (9 h) and long day (9 + 3 h night interruption), and three day/night temperature regimes, 18/14, 22/18, and 26/22 C. After 10 wk of growth, shoot length and weight were 3.4 and 3.5 times greater, respectively, in the long-day photoperiod and with the 26 and 22 than with the 22 and 18 C day and night temperature regime, respectively. Shoot number, however, was greatest in the short-day photoperiod and at a lower temperature of 22/18 C. Shoot number in long day 22/18 C and 26/22 C environments increased asymptotically. No difference in root weight was observed between long- and short-day environments, but root weight increased with increasing temperature. Flowering and tuber production only occurred in long-day environments, with greater production of both at higher temperatures. Results provide a general framework for understanding Florida betony growth and development characteristics in the field and provide insights that should be considered in developing control strategies.

Keywords

Florida betony, Stachys floridana ShuttlewDay lengthtuber formationweed biology
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 267 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. 1997. Weed biology: importance to weed management. Weed Sci 45:349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. J. and Menary, R. C. 1979. Effects of photoperiod on the yield and composition of peppermint oil. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 104:699–702.Google Scholar
Duriyaprapan, S., Britten, E. J., and Basford, K. E. 1986. The effect of temperature on growth, oil yield and oil quality of Japanese mint. Ann. Bot 58:729–736.Google Scholar
Farooqi, A. H. A., Sangwan, N. S., and Sangwan, R. S. 1999. Effect of different photoperiodic regimes on growth, flowering and essential oil in Mentha species. Plant Growth Regul 29:181–187.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic. 892 p.Google Scholar
Howe, L. S. III and Neal, J. C. 2000. Florida Betony (Stachys floridana) Identification and Management. Horticulture Information Leaflet 904. Raleigh, NC: Cooperative Extension Service, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Langston, R. and Leopold, A. C. 1954. Photoperiodic response of peppermint. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 63:347–352.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. R. 1991. Florida Betony Control in Turfgrass and Ornamentals. Leaflet 425. Athens, GA: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Noricini, J. G., Aldrich, J. H., and McDowell, J. M. 1995. Control of Florida betony (Stachys floridana Shuttlew.) emerging from tubers. J. Environ. Hortic 13:89–91.Google Scholar
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: Weed Regulatory Services. 2002. Noxious and Invasive Weeds List. www.ncagr.com/plantind/plant/weed/weedprog.htm.Google Scholar
Phytotron Procedure Manual. 1991. North Carolina State University, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC. Technical Bulletin 244. www.ncsu.edu/phytotron.Google Scholar
Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Manual of Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. Pp. 895–925.Google Scholar
Stamps, R. H. 1992. Prodiamine controlled Florida betony (Stachys floridana) in leatherleaf fern (Rumohra adiantiformis). Weed Technol 6:961–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Climate Office of North Carolina. 2003. Climate Normals, Means, and Extremes for Wilmington, NC. www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., and Dickey, D. A. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. London: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 352–398.Google Scholar
Thomas, B. and Vince-Prue, D. 1997. Photoperiodism in Plants. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic. Pp. 317–334.Google Scholar