Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T10:03:18.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Maria L. Salas ,
Michael V. Hickman ,
Don M. Huber  and
Marvin M. Schreiber
Michael V. Hickman
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue-University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Don M. Huber
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue-University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Marvin M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue-University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate growth and seed production of giant foxtail under different N sources (NO3 and NH4) and N fertilizer application rates. Nitrate and NH4 fertilizers plus nitrification inhibitor were applied at 56, 112, and 225 kg N ha−1 under field conditions, and in the greenhouse four N rates (1, 5, 10, and 25 mM N) were applied in three NO3: NH4 ratios (100 : 0, 50 : 50, 0 : 100). Growth of giant foxtail was affected by N rates under both greenhouse and field conditions. In 1993, abundant rainfall in May and June allowed a rapid and earlier uptake of N by giant foxtail, resulting in larger plants with greater N accumulation and higher numbers of heads and seeds than in 1994. Total dry weight increased with increasing N rates; however, seed production reached a maximum at approximately 150 kg N ha−1. Nitrogen translocation efficiency decreased with increasing N rates. Giant foxtail did not show any preference to N form; however, seed production was reduced when the high N rate was applied as NH4 compared to NO3. These results suggest that NH4 fertilizer applications with a long-term nitrification inhibitor could reduce the seed production of giant foxtail and its contribution to the soil seedbank for subsequent growing seasons.

Keywords

Giant foxtailSetaria faberi HerrmSETFANitrogen nutritionweed biologyseed production
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 664 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed. Washington, DC. 24.Google Scholar
Barker, A. V. and Mills, H. A. 1980. Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hortic. Rev. 2: 395–423.Google Scholar
Bock, B. R. 1986. Increasing cereal yield with higher ammonium/nitrate ratios: review of potential and limitations. J. Environ. Sci. Health 21: 723–758.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. 1994. The ultimate list of worst weeds. Crop Prot. Manage. 7: 48–49.Google Scholar
Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: effect of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, R. M. and Keeney, D. R. 1971. Specific ion electrodes: technique and uses in soil, plant and water analysis. in Walsh, L. M., ed. Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 39–65.Google Scholar
Childs, D. J., Jordan, T. N., Blackwell, R. L., and Geiger, C. R. 1992. Survey of Problem Weeds in Indiana. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Cooperative Extension Pub. WS-10.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. S. 1985. Weed control in corn. in King, R., ed. Farmers Weed Control Handbook. St. Louis, MO: Doane, pp. 21–41.Google Scholar
Gashaw, L. and Mugwira, L. M. 1981. Ammonium-N and nitrate-N effects on the growth and mineral composition of triticale, wheat and rye. Agron. J. 73: 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givan, C. V. 1979. Metabolic detoxification of ammonium in tissue of higher plants. Phytochemistry 18: 375–382.Google Scholar
Goyal, S. S., Lorez, O. A., and Huffaker, R. C. 1982. Inhibitory effects of ammoniacal nitrogen on growth of radish plants. 1. Characterization of toxic effects of NH4 on growth and its alleviation by NO3 . J. Am. Hortic. Sci. 107: 125–129.Google Scholar
Handa, S., Huber, D. M., Warren, H. L., and Tsai, C. Y. 1984. Nitrogen nutrition and N-assimilation in maize seedling. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 87–93.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. J. and Goh, K. M. 1978. Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of plants. Biol. Rev. 53: 465–510.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. and Drew, M. C. 1989. Rapid reversible inhibition of nitrate influx in barley by ammonium. J. Exp. Bot. 40: 741–752.Google Scholar
Lewis, O.A.M., Cramer, M., and Van Der Leij, T. 1990. Influence of nitrogen source on carbon distribution in plants exhibiting the C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathway. in Ullrich, W. R., Rigano, C., and Fuggi, A., eds. Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants and Microorganisms, Uptake and Metabolism. Berlin: Spring-Verlag, pp. 329–335.Google Scholar
Lips, S. H., Leidi, E. O., Siberbush, M., Soares, M.I.M., and Lewis, O.E.M. 1990. Physiological aspects of ammonium and nitrate fertilization. J. Plant Nutr. 13: 1271–1289.Google Scholar
Macknown, C. T., Jackson, W. A., and Volk, R. J. 1982. Restricted nitrate influx and reduction in corn seedling exposed to ammonium. Plant Physiol. 69: 353–359.Google Scholar
Malicki, L. and Berbeciowa, C. 1986. Uptake of more important mineral components by common fields weeds on loess soil. Acta Agrobotamika 39: 129–141.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R. and Schreiber, M. M. 1971. Differential selectivity of herbicides on six Setaria taxa. Weed Sci. 19: 428–431.Google Scholar
Qasem, J. R. 1992. Nutrient accumulation by weeds and their associated vegetables crops. J. Hortic. Sci. 67: 189–195.Google Scholar
Radin, J. W. 1975. Differential regulation of nitrate reductase induction in roots and shoots of cotton plants. Plant Physiol. 55: 178–182.Google Scholar
Reisenauer, H. M. 1978. Absorption and utilization of ammonium nitrogen by plants. in Neilsen, D. R. and MacDonald, J. G., eds. Nitrogen in the Environment. New York: Academic Press, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar
Salas, M. L., Hickman, M. V., and Schreiber, M. M. 1994. Influence of nitrogen sources and rates on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34: 83.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M. and Orwick, P. L. 1978. Influence of nitrogen fertilization growth of foxtail (Setaria) taxa. Weed Sci. 26: 547–550.Google Scholar
Stromberger, J. A., Tsai, C. Y., and Huber, D. M. 1994. Interactions of potassium with nitrogen and their influence on growth and yield potential in maize. J. Plant Nutr. 17: 19–37.Google Scholar
Teyker, R. H., Hoelzer, H. D., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Maize and pigweed response to nitrogen supply and form. Plant Soil 135: 287–292.Google Scholar
Xu, Q. F., Tsai, C. L., and Tsai, C. Y. 1992. Interaction of potassium with the form and amount of nitrogen nutrition on growth and nitrogen uptake of maize. J. Plant Nutr. 15: 23–33.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stage cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1993. Fundamentals of Weed Science. New York: Academic Press. 450 p.Google Scholar