Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:14:17.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Dichlobenil, Endothall, and Bromoxynil on Kinin Control of Proteolytic Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California
Floyd M. Ashton
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California

Abstract

The herbicides 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil), 7-oxabicyclo-(2.2.1)heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid (endothall), and 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile (bromoxynil) were examined for their influence on the activity and synthesis of proteolytic enzyme(s) in the cotyledons of squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) seedlings. None of these herbicides affected the activity per se of the isolated proteolytic enzyme(s). The presence of the herbicides in the culture solution during germination caused different effects on the development of the proteolytic activity in the cotyledons for each of the three herbicides. Dichlobenil reduced the development of the activity in both the excised cotyledons and the cotyledons of intact embryos. This inhibition was overcome in part by the addition of benzyladenine to the culture solution. The inhibition of hormone synthesis or export by the embryonic axis caused by dichlobenil could explain the observed results. Endothall inhibited the development of the proteolytic activity in the cotyledons of the intact embryo treatment but had little effect on the excised cotyledons. Benzyladenine did not reverse this inhibition. The effect of endothall resembled the inhibition caused by actinomycin D, possibly indicating that endothall interfered with ribonucleic acid metabolism. Bromoxynil inhibited the proteolytic enzyme(s) development in the cotyledons of intact embryos but not in the excised cotyledons. This inhibition was partly overcome by benzyladenine. These results suggest that bromoxynil not only interferes with the hormonal control mechanism but also proteinase synthesis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anson, M. L. 1938. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papin, and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J. Gen. Physio. 22:7989.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M., Penner, D., and Hoffman, S. 1968. Effect of several herbicides on proteolytic activity of squash seedlings. Weeds (in press).Google Scholar
3. Foy, C. L. and Penner, D. 1965. Effects of inhibitors and herbicides on tricarboxylic acid cycle substrate oxidation by isolated cucumber mitochondria. Weeds 13:226231.Google Scholar
4. Henshall, J. D. and Goodwin, T. W. 1964. Amino acid-activating enzymes in germinating pea seedlings. Phytochemistry 3:677691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kunitz, M. 1947. Crystalline soybean trypsin inhibitor. II. General properties. J. Gen. Physiol. 30:291310.Google Scholar
6. Mann, J. D., Jordan, L. S., and Day, B. E. 1965. A survey of herbicides for their effect upon protein synthesis. Plant Physiol. 40:840843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Marcus, A. and Feeley, J. 1964. Activation of protein synthesis in the imbibition phase of seed germination. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. 51:10751079.Google Scholar
8. Paleg, L. 1960. Physiological effects of gibberellic acid. I. On carbohydrate metabolism and amylase activity of barley endosperms. Plant Physiol. 35:293299.Google Scholar
9. Paleg, L. 1960. Physiological effects of gibberellic acid. II. On starch hydrolyzing enzymes of barley endosperm. Plant Physiol. 35:902906.Google Scholar
10. Paleg, L. 1961. Physiological effects of gibberellic acid. III. Observations on its mode of action on barley endosperm. Plant Physiol. 36:829837.Google Scholar
11. Paleg, L., Sparrow, D. H. B., and Jennings, A. 1962. Physiological effects of gibberellic acid. IV. On barley grain with normal, x-irradiated, and excised embryos. Plant Physiol. 37:579583.Google Scholar
12. Penner, D. and Ashton, F. M. 1966. Proteolytic enzyme control in squash cotyledons. Nature 212:935936.Google Scholar
13. Penner, D. and Ashton, F. M. 1967. Hormonal control of proteinase activity in squash cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 42:791796.Google Scholar
14. Reich, E., Franklin, R. M., Shatkin, A. J., Tatum, E. C. 1961. Effect of actinomycin D on cellular nucleic acid and virus production. Science 134:556557.Google Scholar
15. Varner, J. E. 1964. Gibberellic acid controlled synthesis of α-amylase in barley endosperm. Plant Physiol. 39:413415.Google Scholar
16. Varner, J. E. and Ram Chandra, G. 1964. Hormonal control of enzyme synthesis in barley endosperm. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S. 52:100106.Google Scholar
17. Warburg, O. 1948. Wasserstoffubertragende Fermente. Werner Saenger Press, Berlin. 368 p.Google Scholar
18. Wiley, L. and Ashton, F. M. 1967. Influence of the embry onic axis on protein hydrolysis in cotyledons of Cucurbita maxima . Physiol. Plantarum 20:688696.Google Scholar
19. Yemm, E. W. and Cocking, E. C. 1955. The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst 80:209213.Google Scholar
20. Young, J. L. and Varner, J. E. 1959. Enzyme synthesis in the cotyledons of germinating seeds. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 84:7178.Google Scholar