Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:05:49.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of 2,4-D and MCPA Formulations and Oil on Diclofop Phytotoxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Greg R. Gillespie  and
John D. Nalewaja
Greg R. Gillespie
Affiliation:
CIBA-GEIGY Corp., Greensboro, NC
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 1984 and 1985 to determine the influence of 2,4-D and MCPA amine and ester formulations on control of foxtail millet with diclofop. Foxtail millet control increased as the diclofop rate increased from 0.6 to 1.7 kg ai/ha whether diclofop was applied alone or with 2,4-D or MCPA amine and ester formulations; however, foxtail millet control was lower when diclofop was applied with 2,4-D or MCPA amine and ester formulations compared to diclofop applied alone. MCPA ester, MCPA amine, 2,4-D ester, or 2,4-D amine at 0.14 kg ai/ha added to a diclofop spray mixture reduced foxtail millet control 8, 15, 20, and 30% compared to diclofop applied alone, averaged over diclofop rates of 0.6, 0.8, 1.1, 1.4, and 1.7 kg/ha. Adding a petroleum oil to diclofop increased foxtail millet control with diclofop at 0.6 kg/ha but not at 0.8 kg/ha. The petroleum oil additive did not overcome the antagonism of foxtail millet control when diclofop at 0.6 kg/ha was applied with 2,4-D or MCPA amine and ester formulations. The amount of 14C-diclofop absorbed by oats was greater when diclofop was applied with the ester formulations of 2,4-D or MCPA compared to the amine formulations. Either once-refined sunflower oil or sunflower oil methyl ester applied with 14C-diclofop increased the amount of 14C absorbed and translocated in oat plants compared to 14C-diclofop applied alone.

Keywords

Diclofop, (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acidMCPA, (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidfoxtail millet, Setaria italica L. ‘Siberian’♯3 SETIToats, Avena sativa L. ‘Lyon’sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.Adjuvantantagonismherbicideherbicide mixturestank mixtures
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , May 1989 , pp. 380 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R., Elakkad, M., and Smith, L. J. 1974. Wild oat control in wheat and barley. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:89–94.Google Scholar
2. Boldt, P. F. and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Selectivity mechanisms for foliar applications of diclofop-methyl. I. Retention, translocation, and volatility. Weed Sci. 26:474–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chow, P.N.P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352–358.Google Scholar
4. Friesen, H. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Vanden Born, W. H.: 1976. HOE 23408, a new selective herbicide for wild oats and green foxtail control in wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:567–578.Google Scholar
5. Gillespie, G. R. and Miller, S. D. 1983. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of diclofop by sunflower. Weed Sci. 31:658–663.Google Scholar
6. Gillespie, G. R. and Miller, S. D. 1984. Diclofop interaction with MCPA and dicamba in sunflower. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 37:174–183.Google Scholar
7. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. HOE-23408 for postemergence wild oat and yellow foxtail control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:38–39.Google Scholar
8. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1980. Diclofop (Hoelon) for wild oat and green foxtail control. N. D. Farm Res. 38(2): 19–22.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D., Manthey, F. A., Szeleniak, E. F., and Peterson, D. E. 1986. Methylated seed oils with herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:14.Google Scholar
10. Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Antagonistic effects of MCPA on wild oat control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 29:566–571.Google Scholar
11. Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Effect of MCPA on 14C-diclofop uptake and translocation. Weed Sci. 30:59–63.Google Scholar
12. O'Sullivan, P. A., Friesen, H. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Influence of herbicides for broad-leaved weeds and adjuvants with diclofop-methyl on wild oat control. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:117–125.Google Scholar
13. Quershi, F. A. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1979. Interaction of diclofop-methyl and MCPA on wild oats. Weed Sci. 27:202–205.Google Scholar
14. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1978. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:615–623.Google Scholar
15. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat, and green foxtail. Weed Sci. 25:382–385.Google Scholar
16. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity. Weed Sci. 28:371–377.Google Scholar
17. West, L. D., Dawson, J. H., and Appleby, A. P. 1980. Factors influencing barnyardgrass control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:366–371.Google Scholar