Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:05:08.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impacts of crop pests on weeds and weed–crop interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen H. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003
Leigh W. Murray
Affiliation:
University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003

Abstract

The literature relating to the impact of other pests on weeds of agroecosystems is minimal. A great deal of literature discusses the effect of organisms used for biological control of weeds; however, pest organisms used as biological control agents are not the subject of this paper. The objective of this review is to present what is known about the impact of insect, pathogen, and nematode pests on weeds; to outline some of the gaps in our knowledge; to present concepts from the ecological literature that might provide insight; and to discuss implications for integrated pest management. The limited data that are available suggest that weeds require fewer resources to survive in the presence of the pest complex than the crop and that weeds would potentially have a greater ability to survive, compete, and reproduce in a competitive environment compared to the planted crop. We suggest that three categories of weed response to polyphagous crop pests may occur in agricultural fields: susceptible weed species or biotypes that host the pest with severe effects on growth and fecundity and therefore are of limited concern in terms of competition for resources; tolerant weed species that host the pest without severe effects on growth and fecundity, resulting in effective competition with the crop and larger pest populations; and resistant weed species that do not host the pest but compete effectively with the crop. We propose the hypothesis that the weed community in many agricultural fields is dominated by plant species that are tolerant or resistant to the endemic pest complex, particularly the soil pest complex, because of constant selection pressure from these pests.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alston, D. G., Bradley, J. R., Coble, H. D., and Schmitt, D. P. 1991. Impact of population density of Heterodera glycines on soybean canopy growth and weed competition. Plant Dis 75:10161018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. E. 2002. Impact of pest herbivores on weeds. Pages 7779 in Proceedings of the 54th Annual Conference of the California Weed Science Society. San Jose, CA: California Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Bergelson, J. and Purrington, C. B. 1996. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am. Nat 148:536558.Google Scholar
Bos, L. 1981. Wild plants in the ecology of virus diseases. Pages 133 in Maramorosch, K. and Harris, K. F. eds. Plant Diseases and Vectors: Ecology and Epidemiology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Browde, J. A., Pedigo, L. P., Owen, M. D. K., and Tylka, G. L. 1994. Soybean yield and pest management as influenced by nematodes, herbicides, and defoliating insects. Agron. J 86:601608.Google Scholar
Buntin, G. D. and Pedigo, L. P. 1986. Enhancement of annual weed populations in alfalfa after stubble defoliation by variegated cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol 79:15071512.Google Scholar
Choate, J., Wehtje, G., and Bowen, K. L. 1998. Interaction of paraquat-based weed control with chlorothalonil-based disease control in peanut. J. Prod. Agric 11:191195.Google Scholar
Dinoor, A. 1974. Role of wild and cultivated plants in the epidemiology of plant diseases in Israel. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol 12:413436.Google Scholar
Dowdy, A. K., Berberet, R. C., Stritzke, J. F., Caddel, J. L., and McNew, R. W. 1993. Interaction of alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), weeds, and fall harvest options as determinants of alfalfa productivity. J. Econ. Entomol 86:12411249.Google Scholar
Duffus, J. E. 1971. Role of weeds in the incidence of virus diseases. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol 9:319340.Google Scholar
Eisenback, J. D. and Triantaphyllou, H. H. 1991. Root-knot nematodes: Meloidogyne species and races. Pages 191274 in Nickle, W. R. ed. Manual of Agricultural Helminthology. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. J. 1992. Weed hosts of beet western yellows virus and potato leafroll virus in British Columbia. Plant Dis 76:11371139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez Ponce, R., Zancada, C., Verdugo, M., and Salas, L. 1995. The influence of the nematode Meloidogyne incognita on competition between Solanum nigrum and tomato. Weed Res 35:437443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, B. J., Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 2003. Root-knot nematodes and tuber size affect early season growth of purple and yellow nutsedges. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 56:92.Google Scholar
Griffin, G. D. 1982. Differences in the response of certain weed host populations to Heterodera schachtii . J. Nematol 14:174182.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C., van Eerd, L. L., Miller, S. D., Owen, M. D. K., Prather, T. S., Shaner, D. L., Singh, M., Vaughn, K. C., and Weller, S. C. 2000. Future research directions for weed science. Weed Technol 14:647658.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. Pages 824 and 125–133 in The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C., Todd, J. W., Culbreath, A. K., and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1996. Role of warm-season weeds in spotted wilt epidemiology in the southeastern coastal plain. Agron. J 88:928933.Google Scholar
Klironomos, J. N. 2002. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:6770.Google Scholar
Meyer, G. A. and Root, R. B. 1993. Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod. Ecology 74:11171128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. and Kogan, M. 2000. Interactions between weeds, arthropod pests, and their natural enemies in managed ecosystems. Weed Sci 48:94158.Google Scholar
Orians, C. M. 2000. The effects of hybridization in plants on secondary chemistry: implications for the ecology and evolution of plant–herbivore interactions. Am. J. Bot 87:17491756.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology, Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 7071 and 89–93.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 1999. Yellow and purple nutsedge are not injured by root-knot nematodes inoculated at increasing population densities. Weed Sci 47:201207.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 2004. Root-knot nematodes affect annual and perennial weed interactions with chile pepper. Weed Sci 52:2846.Google Scholar
Siemens, D. H., Garner, S. H., Mitchell-Olds, T., and Callaway, R. R. 2002. Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: Brassica rapa may grow and defend. Ecology 83:505517.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Schroeder, J., and Murray, L. W. 1996. Interactions involving root-knot nematodes and annual or perennial weeds. Third International Nematology Congress. Nematropica 26:227.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Schroeder, J., and Murray, L. W. 2005. The role of weeds in nematode management. Weed Sci 53:923928.Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L. R., Harvey, R. G., and Wedberg, J. L. 2001. Interactions among weed, insect, and common rust treatments in sweet corn. Weed Sci 49:209216.Google Scholar
Vezzani, B., Schroeder, J., and Thomas, S. 1993. Host capacity for southern root-knot nematode of seven common weeds in New Mexico. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 46:114.Google Scholar
Westra, P. H., Wyse, D. L., and Cook, E. F. 1981. Weevil (Notaris bimaculatus) feeding reduces effectiveness of glyphosate on quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci 29:540547.Google Scholar