Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:25:13.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicides and Activated Carbon for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. G. Ogg Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WS 99350

Abstract

Preemergence application of chloramben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid) at 5.0 and 6.7 kg/ha, chlorbromuron [3-(4-bromo-3-chlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea] at 2.2 kg/ha, and linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea] + nitralin [4-(methyl-sulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline] at 1.1 + 1.1 kg/ha controlled 95% or more of the barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.], common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), red-root pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), Powell amaranth (A. powellii S. Wats.), and hairy nightshade (Solanum sarachoides Sendt.), but reduced stands and injured direct-seeded asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L. ‘UC-66’). Linuron at 1.1 kg/ha controlled only 84% of the barnyardgrass and metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] at 0.6 kg/ha controlled about 50% of the hairy nightshade. Activated carbon applied at 56 and 112 kg/ha in a 3-cm band over the seeded row protected the asparagus from chloramben at 5.0 kg/ha, chlorbromuron at 2.2 kg/ha, and linuron + nitralin at 1.1 + 1.1 kg/ha. Weed control generally was reduced about 10% in the carbon band, but control was still 85 to 90%. Metribuzin reduced asparagus stands and vigor severely, even when 112 kg/ha of activated carbon was applied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Borthwick, H. A. 1925. Factors influencing the rate of germination of the seed of Asparagus officinalis . Univ. of Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Paper No. 18. 17 pp.Google Scholar
2. Burr, R. J., Lee, W. O., and Appleby, A. P. 1972. Factors affecting use of activated carbon to improve herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 20:180183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lee, W. O. 1973. Clean grass seed crops established with activated carbon bands and herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:537541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Linscott, D. L., and Hagin, R. D. 1967. Protecting alfalfa seedlings from a triazine with activated charcoal. Weeds 15:304306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Sims, W. L., Takatori, F., Johnson, H., and Benson, B. 1971. Direct seeding of asparagus. Univ. of Calif. Agric. Ext. Bull. AXT-348. 12 pp.Google Scholar
6. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
7. Takatori, F. H., Stillman, J. I., and Power, B. 1968. Direct seeding of asparagus. Calif. Agric. 22:810.Google Scholar
8. Williams, R. D., and Romanowski, R. R. 1972. Vermiculite and activated carbon adsorbents protect direct-seeded tomatoes from partially selective herbicides. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97:245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar