Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:21:57.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicidal Control of Volunteer Castorbean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agr. Res. and Ext. Center at Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas 79401
A. W. Cooley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agr. Res. and Ext. Center at Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas 79401
D. O. Mooney
Affiliation:
High Plains Res. Foundation, Plainview, Texas 79072
A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ., U. S. Dep. Agr. Southwestern Great Plains Res. Center, Bushland, Texas 79012

Abstract

Volunteer castorbean (Ricinus communis L.) was most effectively controlled by preemergence application of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (propazine) at 1.1 to 2.2 kg/ha in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (Moench) L.) and by 1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea (fluometuron) at 1.7 to 2.2 kg/ha in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Preplant applications of propazine were not as effective as preemergence treatments. Efficacy of soil-applied herbicides was greatest when 1 to 2 cm of rain occurred within 7 to 10 days after application. Effective postemergence treatments on castorbean seedlings with two to eight true leaves were 2-chloro-4(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) at 1.1 to 1.7 kg/ha, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron) at 0.9 kg/ha, or 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryne) at 0.9 kg/ha.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brigham, R. D. and Spears, B. R. 1960. Castorbeans in Texas. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 954: 12 p.Google Scholar
2. Zimmerman, L. H. 1968. Castorbeans: a new oil crop. Adv. Agron. 10:257288.Google Scholar