Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:10:43.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Responses of Green and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria viridis and S. lutescens) to Shade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carol J. Bubar  and
Ian N. Morrison
Carol J. Bubar
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3A2
Ian N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth of green foxtail (Setaria viridis L. Beauv. ♯3 SETVI) and yellow foxtail [S. lutescens (Weigel.) Hubb. ♯ SETLU] in full sunlight, under 55 and 73% shade and within a wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’) stand, was compared in field experiments conducted over 3 yr. Shade resulted in a proportionately greater reduction in tiller number of yellow foxtail than of green foxtail. Plants growing in full sunlight produced up to five times more tillers than those growing in the crop. Averaged over the 3 yr, the two shade treatments reduced dry-matter accumulation of both species by 40% or more. The dry weight of plants within the crop was only about one-eighth of that of plants grown in full sunlight. Under both shade treatments and in the crop, yellow foxtail was consistently taller than green foxtail. Nevertheless, no differences in dry weight occurred between species under either shade treatment or in the crop. The results indicate that neither of the two species is distinctly more shade tolerant than the other, nor better adapted to compete with wheat.

Keywords

Triticum aestivumreduced irradianceSETVISETLU
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , November 1984 , pp. 774 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Boyd, J. W. and Murray, D. S. 1982. Effects of shade on silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaegnifolium). Weed Sci. 30:264–269.Google Scholar
2. Cleland, R. E. 1977. The control of cell enlargement. Pages 101–115 in Jennings, D. H., ed. Integration of Activity in Higher Plants. Symp. Soc. for Exp. Bot., Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
3. Donaghy, D. I. 1976. Weed survey in Manitoba–1976. Proc. Manitoba Agron. Conf. Pages 125–130.Google Scholar
4. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1978. Light requirements of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and light interception by crops. Weed Sci. 26:10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knake, E. L. 1972. Effect of shade on giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 20:588–592.Google Scholar
6. Lee, S. M. and Cavers, P. B. 1981. The effects of shade on growth, development and resource allocation patterns on three species of foxtail (Setaria). Can. J. Bot. 59:1776–1786.Google Scholar
7. Nadeau, L. B. and Morrison, I. N. 1983. Root development of two Setaria species under different soil moisture regimes. Aspects Appl. Biol. 4:125–134.Google Scholar
8. Nelson, H. 1975. Preliminary results from weed survey–1975. Proc. Manitoba Agron. Conf. Pages 138–141.Google Scholar
9. Patterson, D. T. 1979. The effects of shading on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata). Weed Sci. 27:549–553.Google Scholar
10. Patterson, D. T. 1982. Shading responses of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 30:25–30.Google Scholar
11. Patterson, D. T. 1982. Effects of shading and temperature on showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis). Weed Sci. 30:692–697.Google Scholar
12. Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 20:588–592.Google Scholar
13. Thomas, A. G., ed. 1982. The 1981 weed survey of cultivated land in Manitoba. Publ. No. 82–1. Agric. Canada, Regina. 124 pp.Google Scholar
14. Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Green foxtail: Seed dormancy, germination and growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 51:53–59.Google Scholar
15. Vengris, J. and Damon, R. A. Jr. 1976. Field growth of fall panicum and witchgrass. Weed Sci. 24:205–208.Google Scholar
16. Williams, R. D. and Schreiber, M. M. 1976. Numerical and chemotaxonomy of the green foxtail complex. Weed Sci. 24:331–335.Google Scholar