Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:05:38.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Yield of Flax (Linum usitatissimum) Injured by Trifluralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ken M. Nawolsky ,
Ian N. Morrison ,
George M. Marshall  and
Allen E. Smith
Ken M. Nawolsky
Affiliation:
Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Ian N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
George M. Marshall
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr. U.K., KA6 5HW, and Res. Sci., Agric. Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, S4P 3A2
Allen E. Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr. U.K., KA6 5HW, and Res. Sci., Agric. Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, S4P 3A2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationships between the actual amount of spring-applied trifluralin detected in soil at seeding, initial injury to flax, and crop growth and yield were investigated in southern Manitoba over three growing seasons. As the amount of trifluralin in the soil increased, flax density and dry matter production decreased, such that at a soil concentration equivalent to 1 kg ai ha−1 trifluralin, the two were reduced by 40 and 49%, respectively. Recovery from early-season injury was characterized by enhanced crop growth rates (CGRs) and net assimilation rates (NARs) of surviving plants during the remainder of the growing season. Maximum recovery occurred in plots where trifluralin levels in the soil were between 0.8 and 1 kg ha−1 at seeding. During the interval between stem elongation and bud initiation, CGRs and NARs of flax in the trifluralin-treated plots exceeded those of flax in the untreated plots by up to 1.5 and 1.2 times, respectively. Additionally, the number of branches per plant increased linearly as trifluralin amounts in the soil increased. Flax seed yield was decreased by trifluralin as described by the equation: flax seed (% of untreated control) = 104.9 - 13.3[trifluralin detected (kg ha−1) at seeding]. Based on this equation, trifluralin levels in the soil of up to 0.7 kg ai ha−1 caused less than a 5% reduction in flax yield under weed-free conditions.

Keywords

Trifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamineflax, Linum usitatissimum L. ‘Dufferin’Trifluralin injuryflax tolerancecrop growth rate
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 460 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1988. Page 38 in Guide to Chemical Weed Control 1988. Manitoba Agriculture, Winnipeg, Man.Google Scholar
2. Daman, R. F. Jr. and Harvey, W. R. 1987. Pages 185–274 in Experimental Design, ANOVA, and Regression. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
3. Gardner, F. P., Pearce, R. B., and Mitchell, R. 1985. Pages 199–205 in Physiology of Crop Plants. Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa, U.S.A. Google Scholar
4. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Pages 458–477 in Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.Google Scholar
5. Grover, R., Smith, A. E., Shewchuk, S. R., Cessna, A. J., and Hunter, J. H. 1988. Fate of trifluralin and triallate applied as a mixture to a wheat field. J. Environ. Qual. 17:543–550.Google Scholar
6. Gubbels, G. H. 1978. Interaction of cultivar and seeding rate on various agronomic characteristics of flax. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:303–319.Google Scholar
7. Marshall, G., Morrison, I. N., and Nawolsky, K. 1989. Studies on the physiology of Linum usitatissimum L.: The application of mathematical growth analysis. Pages 39–47 in Marshall, G., ed. Flax: Breeding and Utilisation. Kluewer Academic Publishers, London, UK.Google Scholar
8. Morrison, I. N., Nawolsky, K. M., Marshall, G. M., and Smith, A. E. 1989. Recovery of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) injured by trifluralin. Weed Sci. 37:784–789.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D., Kolota, E., and Miller, S. D. 1987. Flax response to trifluralin. Weed Technol. 1:286–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. O'Sullivan, P. A., Weiss, G. M., and Friesen, D. 1985. Tolerance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to trifluralin deep-incorporated in the autumn or spring. Weed Res. 25:275–280.Google Scholar
11. Pchajek, D. A., Morrison, I. N., and Webster, G.R.B. 1983. Comparison of the efficacy and soil concentrations of fall- and spring-applied trifluralin in flax. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:1031–1038.Google Scholar
12. Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Pages 135–151 in Nonlinear Regression Modeling—A Unified Practical Approach. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
13. Smith, A. E. 1981. Comparison of solvent systems for the extraction of atrazine, benzoylprop, flamprop, and trifluralin from weathered field soils. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 29:111–115.Google Scholar