Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:24:53.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Morphology, Growth, and Seed Production in Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Theodore M. Webster  and
Timothy L. Grey
Theodore M. Webster*
Affiliation:
Crop Protection and Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA 31794
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth has become the most economically detrimental weed of cotton in the southeast United States. With the continual marginalization of potential herbicide tools, research has expanded to include alternative means of affecting future Palmer amaranth populations by altering safe sites and reducing inputs to the seedbank population. The influence of delayed Palmer amaranth establishment on seed production potential has not been investigated in the southeast United States. Studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of time of Palmer amaranth establishment on morphology, growth, and seed production. The experiment was a factorial, with five levels of Palmer amaranth transplanting (0 to 12 wk after cotton planting) and two levels of crop type (cotton and noncrop). In the absence of crop competition, the first cohort of Palmer amaranth produced 446,000 seeds per plant. This potential seed production was reduced 50% when Palmer amaranth plants were established nearly 6 wk later. In contrast, the first Palmer amaranth cohort growing in competition with cotton produced 312,000 seeds, 30% less than was produced in the absence of competition. Interference from cotton shifted time to 50% seed production to nearly 4 wk earlier in the growing season, relative to plants without crop competition. Delayed establishment of Palmer amaranth simulates premature loss of herbicide efficacy and alters the competitive balance between cotton and Palmer amaranth. Although the planting time that resulted in 50% reduction in Palmer amaranth plant height at the end of the season was not affected by the presence of cotton, 50% reduction in plant width and biomass occurred within the first 3.8 wk of the growing season when growing with cotton, more than 4 wk earlier than Palmer amaranth growing without a crop. This suggests that early season weed control programs will have a large effect on Palmer amaranth potential growth and seed production, as well as crop yield. To implement soil seedbank reduction strategies effectively, information on mechanisms that regulate Palmer amaranth persistence in the soil seedbank is needed.

Keywords

Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats. AMAPAcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DP1050’.Fecundityherbicide resistancepigweedsoil seedbank
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 264 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Askew, SD, Wilcut, JW (2001) Tropic croton interference in cotton. Weed Sci. 49:184–189 Google Scholar
Askew, SD, Wilcut, JW (2002) Ladysthumb interference and seed production in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:326–332 Google Scholar
Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2013) Postdispersal loss of important arable weed seeds in the midsouthern United States. Weed Sci. 61:570–579 Google Scholar
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37–43 Google Scholar
Bryson, CT, DeFelice, MS, eds (2009) Weeds of the South. Athens University of Georgia Press. 468 pGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD (1996) Development of alternative weed management strategies. J. Prod. Agric. 9:501–505 Google Scholar
Cardina, J, Webster, TM, Herms, CP, Regnier, EE (1999) Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. Pp 239–267 in Buhler, DD, ed. Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York Haworth Press Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620–626 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Kichler, JM, York, AC (2013a) University of Georgia Herbicide Programs for Controlling Palmer Amaranth in 2013 Cotton. Athens: University of Georgia Collge of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Circ. 924. http://gaweed.com/HomepageFiles/2013Palmerhandout-finalFeb12.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2013Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM (2013b) Rolling High Rye for Conservation Tillage Cotton Success. Athens: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0VTHsRO_0Q. Accessed December 12, 2014Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Whitaker, JR, MacRae, AW, York, AC (2008) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Georgia and North Carolina during 2005 and 2006. J Cotton Sci. 12:306–310 Google Scholar
Elmore, CD (1989) Weed survey—southern states, broadleaf crop subsection. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 42:416–418 Google Scholar
Fast, BJ, Murdock, SW, Farris, RL, Willis, JB, Murray, DS (2009) Critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) removal in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton. J Cotton Sci. 13:32–36 Google Scholar
Gallandt, ER (2006) How can we target the weed seedbank? Weed Sci. 54:588–596 Google Scholar
Glantz, SA, Slinker, BK (2001) Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. 2nd edn. New York McGraw-Hill Medical Pub Division. Pp 25–28 Google Scholar
Harper, J (1956) The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc 3rd Br Weed Control Conf 1:179–188 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK (1990) Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:113–118 Google Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Bruce, B, Nordby, D (2004) Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Sci. 52:242–245 Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 48:347–355 Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Maxwell, BD, Anderson, RL, Evans, JO, Lyon, DJ, Miller, SD, Morishita, DW, Ogg, AG Jr., Seefeldt, S, Stahlman, PW, Northam, FE, Westra, P, Kebede, Z, Wicks, GA (1999) Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum–Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:529–537 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK (2009) Soybean canopy and tillage effects on emergence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from a natural seed bank. Weed Sci. 57:644–651 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK (2012) Influence of late-season herbicide applications on control, fecundity, and progeny fitness of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) biotypes from Arkansas. Weed Technol 26:807–812 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Bridges, W, Riley, MB (2008) Influence of glyphosate timing and row width on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and pusley (Richardia spp.) demographics in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci. 56:408–415 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci. 35:199–204 Google Scholar
MacRae, AW, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, Kichler, JM, Culpepper, AS (2013) Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. J Cotton Sci. 17:227–232 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 49:202–208 Google Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010) Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci. 58:199–203 Google Scholar
Mohseni-Moghadam, M, Schroeder, J, Ashigh, J (2013) Mechanism of resistance and inheritance in glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations from New Mexico, USA. Weed Sci. 61:517–525 Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Bastiaans, L, Sattin, M (2000) The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook. Weed Res 40:49–62 Google Scholar
Motulsky, H, Christopoulos, A (2003) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting. San Diego GraphPad Software Inc., www.graphpad.com. 351 pGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Reddy, KN, Koger, CH, Poston, DH, Rimando, AM, Duke, SO, Bond, JA, Ribeiro, DN (2012) Multiple resistance to glyphosate and pyrithiobac in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from Mississippi and response to flumiclorac. Weed Sci. 60:179–188 Google Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modelling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri . Weed Res 51:99–112 Google Scholar
Nichols, RL, Bond, J, Culpepper, AS, Dodds, D, Nandula, V, Main, CL, Marshall, MW, Mueller, TC, Norsworthy, JK, Price, A, Patterson, M, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, D, Wright, D, York, AC (2009) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) spreads in the southern United States (U.S.). Resistant Pest Manage Newsl 18:8–10 Google Scholar
Norris, RF (2000) My view. Weed Sci. 48:273–273 Google Scholar
Norris, RF (2007) Weed fecundity: current status and future needs. Crop Prot 26:182–188 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108–113 Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Pipper, CB, Streibig, JC (2013) Analysis of germination data from agricultural experiments. Eur J Agron 45:1–6 Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc (2006) Base SAS 9.1.3 Procedures Guide, Second Edition, Volumes 1, 2, 3, and 4. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc. 1906 pGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Liu, JY, Davis, AS, Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE (2010) Environmental factors that influence the association of an earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris L.) and an annual weed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in no-till agricultural fields across the eastern US Corn Belt. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 138:197–205 Google Scholar
Seaman, RE, Marino, PC (2003) Influence of mound building and selective seed predation by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) on an old-field plant assemblage. J Torrey Bot Soc 130:193–201 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG, Kendig, JA, Ellersieck, MR (2003) Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Sci. 51:329–333 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, T., Culpepper, AS (2013) Glyphosate resistance does not affect Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seedbank longevity. Weed Sci. 61:283–288 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2014) Severed stems of Amaranthus palmeri are capable of regrowth and seed production in Gossypium hirsutum . Ann Appl Biol. 165:147–154 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Main, CL, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2008) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee has low level glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 22:119–123 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Sprague, CL (2004) Late-season common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in narrow- and wide-row soybean. Weed Technol 18:947–952 Google Scholar
Timper, P, Davis, RF, Webster, TM, Brenneman, TB, Meyer, SLF, Zasada, IA, Cai, G, Rice, CP (2011) Response of root-knot nematodes and Palmer amaranth to tillage and rye green manure. Agron J. 103:813–821 Google Scholar
Uscanga-Mortera, E, Clay, SA, Forcella, E, Gunsolus, J (2007) Common waterhemp growth and fecundity as influenced by emergence date and competing crop. Agron J. 99:1265–1270 Google Scholar
Vander Wall, SB, Kuhn, KM, Beck, MJ (2005) Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology. 86:801–806 Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS, Gaines, C, Westra, R (2008) Herbicide-resistance in the Amaranthaceae . J Plant Dis Prot (Special Issue 21):41–44 Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Coble, HD (1997) Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol 11:308–317 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Nichols, RL (2012) Changes in the prevalence of weed species in the major agronomic crops of the southern United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci. 60:145–157 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Scully, BT, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2013) Winter cover crops influence Amaranthus palmeri establishment. Crop Prot 52:130–135 Google Scholar