Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:32:35.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate Resistance Is More Variable Than Paraquat Resistance in a Multiple-Resistant Hairy Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Marcelo L. Moretti ,
Bradley D. Hanson ,
Kurt J. Hembree  and
Anil Shrestha
Marcelo L. Moretti
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Bradley D. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Kurt J. Hembree
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, 1720 S. Maple Ave., Fresno, CA 93702
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, California State University, 2415 E. San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reduced control of some glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane populations with paraquat has raised concerns about evolved multiple resistance to both glyphosate and paraquat. The objective of this study was to confirm the presence of multiple-resistant (glyphosate and paraquat) hairy fleabane populations in California. A series of dose-response experiments was conducted to evaluate the effect of glyphosate and paraquat in a known susceptible (S) and putative multiple-resistant (R) population of hairy fleabane. The greenhouse experiments were conducted during summer, fall, and winter under controlled temperature and natural light conditions. Multiple-resistant hairy fleabane was identified; however, the level of resistance to glyphosate varied substantially among seasons. During the summer, the glyphosate rate required to reduce growth by 50% (GR50) for the R population was 0.94 kg ae ha−1, 5.2-fold more than for the S population. In the fall and winter experiments, however, the R population response to glyphosate was similar to the S population with a GR50 of 0.22 kg ae ha−1 or less. Multiple-resistant plants were controlled in the fall and winter at rates that did not control the same population during summer. GR50 of paraquat varied among seasons (0.94, 0.24, and 0.07 kg ai ha−1 during summer, fall, and winter, respectively); however, plant mortality was more consistent. This is the first reported case of glyphosate–paraquat resistance in hairy fleabane and the multiple-resistant population could pose a significant challenge to annual no-till and perennial cropping systems in California. Further research on the mechanisms of resistance and the physiological factors underlying the seasonally variable response to glyphosate is needed.

Keywords

Glyphosateparaquathairy fleabane, Conyza bonariensis (L.) CronqHerbicide resistancemultiple-resistance
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 396 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckie, H. J. 2011. Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:1037–1048.Google Scholar
Christoffoleti, P. J., Galli, A.J.B., Carvalho, S.J.P., Moreira, M. S., Nicolai, M., Foloni, L. L., Martins, B.A.B., and Ribeiro, D. N. 2008. Glyphosate sustainability in South American cropping systems. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:422–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CIMIS. 2012. California Irrigation Management Information System—Department of Water Resources. http://www.cimis.water.ca.gov. Accessed October 15, 2012.Google Scholar
Dinelli, G., Marotti, I., Bonetti, A., Catizone, P., Urbano, J. M., and Barnes, J. 2008. Physiological and molecular bases of glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis biotypes from Spain. Weed Res. 48:257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, T. W., Nandula, V. K., Poston, D. H., and Shaw, D. R. 2012. Multiple resistance of horseweed to glyphosate and paraquat and its control with paraquat and metribuzin combinations. Agronomy 2:358–370.Google Scholar
Feng, P.C.C., Tran, M., Chiu, T., Sammons, R. D., Heck, G. R., and Jacob, C. A. 2004. Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis): retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci. 52:498–505.Google Scholar
Fuerst, E. P., Nakatani, H. Y., Dodge, A. D., Penner, D., and Arntzen, C. J. 1985. Paraquat resistance in Conyza . Plant Physiol. 77:984–989.Google Scholar
Ge, X., d'Avignon, D. A., Ackerman, J.J.H., Duncan, B., Spaur, M. B., and Sammons, R. D. 2011. Glyphosate resistant horseweed made sensitive to glyphosate: low temperature suppression of glyphosate vacuolar sequestration revealed by 31P NMR. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge, X., d'Avignon, D. A., Ackerman, J.J.H., and Sammons, R. D. 2010. Rapid vacuolar sequestration: the horseweed glyphosate resistance mechanism. Pest Manag. Sci. 66:345–348.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2012. The International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed October 14, 2012.Google Scholar
Jóri, B., Soós, V., Szego, D., Páldi, E., Szigeti, Z., Rácz, I., and Lásztity, D. 2007. Role of transporters in paraquat resistance of horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 88:57–65.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H. and Reddy, K. N. 2005. Role of absorption and translocation in the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 53:84–89.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London, England Chapman and Hall. 511 p.Google Scholar
Moretti, M. L. 2011. Determination of multiple herbicide resistance in populations of hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in the Central Valley of California and evaluation of alternative chemical control. . Fresno, CA: California State University.109 p.Google Scholar
Nol, N., Tsikou, D., Eid, M., Livieratos, I., and Giannopolitis, C. 2012. Shikimate leaf disc assay for early detection of glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis and relative transcript levels of EPSPs and ABC transporter genes. Weed Res. 52:233–241.Google Scholar
Norman, M. A., Smeda, R. J., Vaughn, K. C., and Fuerst, E. P. 1994. Differential movement of paraquat in resistant and sensitive biotypes of Conyza . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 50:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratley, J. E., Urwin, N., Stanton, R., Baines, P., Broster, J., Cullis, K., Schafer, D., Bohn, J., and Krueger, R. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum. I. Bioevaluation. Weed Sci. 47:405–411.Google Scholar
Purba, E., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1995. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat is strongly temperature dependent in resistant Hordeum leporinum Link and H. glaucum Steud. Planta 196:464–468.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2012. Modeling and Multivariate Methods. JMP® 10. Cary, NC SAS Institute, Inc. 712 p.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 2009. Role of translocation as a mechanism of resistance to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 57:118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A., Hanson, B. D., and Hembree, K. J. 2008. Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane documented in the Central Valley. Calif. Agric. 62:116–119.Google Scholar
Travlos, I. S. and Chachalis, D. 2010. Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) is reported in Greece. Weed Technol. 24:569–573.Google Scholar
Urbano, J. M., Borrego, A., Torres, V., Leon, J. M., Jimenez, C., Dinelli, G., and Barnes, J. 2007. Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in Spain. Weed Technol. 21:396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varadi, G., Darko, E., and Lehoczki, E. 2000. Changes in the xanthophyll cycle and fluorescence quenching indicate light-dependent early events in the action of paraquat and the mechanism of resistance to paraquat in Erigeron canadensis (L.) Cronq. Plant Physiol. 123:1459–1469.Google Scholar
Yu, Q., Cairns, A., and Powles, S. 2007. Glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase multiple herbicide resistance evolved in a Lolium rigidum biotype. Planta 225:499–513.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. S., Abercrombie, L.L.G., Cao, Y., Halfhill, M. D., Zhou, X., Peng, Y., Hu, J., Rao, M. R., Heck, G. R., Larosa, T. J., Sammons, R. D., Wang, X., Ranjan, P., Johnson, D. H., Wadl, P. A., Scheffler, B. E., Rinehart, T. A., Trigiano, R. N., and Stewart, C. N. Jr. 2010. Functional genomics analysis of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with special reference to the evolution of non–target-site glyphosate resistance. Weed Sci. 58:109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, J. S., Tranel, P. J., and Stewart, C. N. Jr. 2007. Non-target-site herbicide resistance: a family business. Trends Plant Sci. 12:6–13.Google Scholar