Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T21:55:13.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gibberellin Synthesis Inhibitor Effects on Submersed Aquatic Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael D. Netherland
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
Carole A. Lembi
Affiliation:
Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. J. No. 12526

Abstract

A laboratory bioassay showed that inhibitors of gibberellin synthesis (flurprimidol, paclobutrazol, and uniconazole) reduced plant height but did not affect physiological parameters such as photosynthesis, respiration, and chlorophyll content in two weedy submersed aquatic plants, hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil. Eurasian watermilfoil was sensitive to these compounds at concentrations as low as 0.75 μg L−1. Hydrilla sensitivity was in the range of 75 to 750 μg L−1. The three compounds reduced main and lateral stem lengths in hydrilla; however, at 75 μg L−1 the number of lateral stems and roots was greatly increased over untreated controls resulting in a stoloniferous growth habit. Dominant growth form of treated Eurasian watermilfoil was a single shortened stem with numerous compacted buds. Photosynthesis, respiration, and chlorophyll content were not affected in either plant at nontoxic dosages in which stem reduction was obtained. Both plants required only a 24-h exposure to maintain main stem length reduction for 6 wk after transfer to untreated medium. Our results indicate that these gibberellin synthesis inhibitors would be effective in reducing plant height in aquatic systems.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barko, J. W. and Smart, R. M. 1981. Comparative influences of light and temperature on the growth and metabolism of selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecol. Monogr. 51:219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barko, J. W., Adams, M. S., and Clesceri, N. L. 1986. Environmental factors and their consideration in the management of submersed aquatic vegetation: a review. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 24:110.Google Scholar
3. Campbell, R. W. 1986. Cool-season turfgrass response to growth regulators. Hortscience 21:340.Google Scholar
4. Coolbaugh, R. C. and Hamilton, R. 1976. Inhibition of ent-kaurene oxidation and growth by α-cyclopropyl-α-(p-methoxyphenyl)-5-pyrimidine methyl alcohol. Plant Physiol. 57:245248.Google Scholar
5. Davis, T. D., Sankhla, N., Walser, R., and Upadhyaya, A. 1985. Promotion of adventitious root formation on cuttings of creeping charlie and common bean by paclobutrazol. Hortscience. 20:883884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dejong, T. M. and Doyle, J. 1984. Leaf gas exchange and growth responses of mature ‘Fantasia’ nectarine trees to paclobutrazol. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109:878882.Google Scholar
7. Grace, J. B. and Wetzel, R. 1978. The production biology of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 16:111.Google Scholar
8. Graebe, J. E. 1987. Gibberellin biosynthesis and control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38:419465.Google Scholar
9. Haller, W. T. and Sutton, D. L. 1975. Community structure and competition between Hydrilla and Vallisneria . Hyacinth Control J. 13:4850.Google Scholar
10. Hiscox, J. D. and Israelstam, G. 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without leaf maceration. Can. J. Bot. 57:13321334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hoagland, D. R. and Anion, D. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants with soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Cir. 347.Google Scholar
12. Izumi, K., Nakagawa, S., Koboyashi, M., Oshio, H., Sakurai, A., and Takahashi, N. 1988. Levels of IAA, cytokinins, ABA and ethylene in rice plants as affected by a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, uniconazole-p. Plant Cell Physiol. 29:97104.Google Scholar
13. Izumi, K., Yamaguchi, I., Wada, A., Oshio, H., and Takahashi, N. 1984. Effects of a new plant growth retardant (E)-1-(4 chlorophenyl)-4-4-dimethyl-2-(1,2,4, triazol-1-yl) 1-pentene-3-ol) (S-3307) on the growth and gibberellin content of rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 25:611617.Google Scholar
14. Jaggard, K. W., Lawrence, D., and Biscoe, P. 1982. An understanding of crop physiology in assessing a plant growth regulator on sugar beet. Pages 139150 in McLaren, J. S., ed. Chemical Manipulators of Crop Growth and Development. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
15. Jones, R. L. 1973. Gibberellins: their physiological role. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:571598.Google Scholar
16. Muskgrave, A., Jackson, E., and Ling, E. 1972. Callitriche stem elongation is controlled by ethylene and gibberellin. Nature New Biol. 238:9396.Google Scholar
17. Phinney, B. O. 1983. The history of gibberellins. Pages 1952 in Crozier, A., ed. The Biochemistry and Physiology of Gibberellins. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
18. Rademacher, W. and Jung, J. 1981. Comparative potency of various synthetic plant growth retardants on the elongation of rice seedlings. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 150:363371.Google Scholar
19. Raskin, I. and Kende, H. 1984. The role of gibberellin in the growth response of submerged deep-water rice. Plant Physiol. 76:947950.Google Scholar
20. Riemer, D. N. 1984. Introduction to Freshwater Vegetation. The AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CT. 207 pp.Google Scholar
21. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. The MacMillan Co., New York. 340 pp.Google Scholar
22. Sankhla, N., Davis, T., Upadhyaya, A., Shankhla, D., Walser, R., and Smith, B. 1985. Growth and metabolism of soybeans as affected by paclobutrazol. Plant Cell Physiol. 26:913921.Google Scholar
23. Selim, S. A., O'Neal, S. W., Ross, M. A., and Lembi, C. A. 1989. Bioassay of photosynthetic inhibitors in water and aqueous soil extracts with Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum). Weed Sci. 810814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Steffens, G. L. 1980. Applied uses of growth substances—growth inhibitors. Pages 397408 in Skoog, F., ed. Plant Growth Substances. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
25. Steffens, G. L. 1988. Gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors: comparing growth retarding effectiveness on apple. J. Plant Growth Regul. 7:2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Steffens, G. L., Wang, S., Steffens, C., and Brennen, T. 1983. Influence of paclobutrazol on apple seedling growth and physiology. Proc. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. 10:163168.Google Scholar
27. Sterret, J. P. 1988. XE-1019: plant response, translocation and metabolism. J. Plant Growth Regul. 7:1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Sterret, J. P. and Tworkoski, T. 1987. Flurprimidol: plant response, translocation and metabolism. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112:341345.Google Scholar
29. Temman, S. M. and Elkins, D. 1984. Plant growth regulator effects on turfgrass morphology. Agron. Abstr. 1984:155.Google Scholar
30. Wample, R. L. and Culver, E. 1983. The influence of paclobutrazol, a new growth regulator, on sunflowers. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:122125.Google Scholar
31. Wang, S. Y., Byun, J., and Steffens, G. 1986. Controlling growth of apple seedlings via the GA biosynthesis system. II. Biochemical and physiological alterations. Physiol. Plant 63:169175.Google Scholar