Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:28:41.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination Responses of Opuntia spp. to Temperature, Scarification, and Other Seed Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert L. Potter ,
Joseph L. Petersen  and
Darrell N. Ueckert
Robert L. Potter
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Joseph L. Petersen
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Darrell N. Ueckert
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scarification in sulfuric acid consistently increased germination of Opuntia edwardsii sp. nov, O. discata Griffiths, and O. lindheimeri Engelm. ♯ OPULI seeds over that of untreated seeds. Optimum constant temperatures for germination were generally 25 to 35 C and germination was not enhanced by alternating temperatures. There was a trend for increased germination following leaching in water for 12 h which suggested the presence of chemical germination inhibitors. Seeds passed through the digestive tracts of cattle exhibited average germination percentages that were 1.5 times greater than seeds removed from ripe fruits.

Keywords

Opuntia edwardsiiOpuntia discataOpuntia lindheimeripricklypearOPULI
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 106 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Grant, V., and Grant, K. A. 1979. Systematics of the Opuntia phaeacantha group in Texas. Bot. Gaz. 140:199–207.Google Scholar
2. Lundgren, G. K., Whitson, R. E., Ueckert, D. N., Gilstrap, F. E., and Livingston, C. W. Jr. 1981. Assessment of the pricklypear problem on Texas rangelands. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 1483. 22 pp.Google Scholar
3. Migaki, G., Hinson, L. E., Imes, G. D., and Garner, F. M. 1969. Cactus spines in tongues of slaughtered cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 155:1489–1492.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Pilcher, B. L. 1970. Germination of seeds of four species of Opuntia . Cactus Succulent J. 42:281–282.Google Scholar
5. Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush management – principles and practices for Texas and the Southwest. Texas A&M University Press, College Station and London. 360 pp.Google Scholar
6. Timmons, F. L. 1941. The dissemination of pricklypear seed by jackrabbits. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:513–520.Google Scholar