Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:29:34.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination of Seeds of Common Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) and Its Herbicidal Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W.C. Robocker
W.C. Robocker*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of common yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) germinated 99% with alternating temperatures of 15 and 25 C with concurrent dark and light periods. Germination was significantly higher when temperature was alternated, compared with a constant 15 or 25 C. Alternating light (8 h) and darkness (16 h) with either alternating or constant temperature significantly increased germination when compared with germination in the dark. After 9 yr, seed germinated over 41% under optimum conditions. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) at 2.2 kg/ha reduced common yarrow infestations 90 to 95% in 3 of 4 yr, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid3,4 (designated D-290 in this paper) at 0.6 to 2.2 kg/ha controlled yarrow 90 to 100%. Yields on plots treated with D-290 at 0.6 kg/ha were significantly higher than those on plots treated with all rates of dicamba. Dicamba caused injury to grass and reduced its yield. Triclopyr [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid at 3.4 kg/ha was not effective on yarrow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , September 1977 , pp. 456 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abrams, L., and Ferris, R.S. 1960. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States. Vol. IV. Stanford Univ. Press (Stanford, CA). 732 pp.Google Scholar
2. Frankton, C. 1955. Weeds of Canada. Canada Dep. of Agric. (Ottawa, Ont.). 196 pp.Google Scholar
3. Griswold, S.M. 1936. Effect of alternate moistening and drying on germination of seeds of western range plants. Bot. Gaz. 98:243–269.Google Scholar
4. Hitchcock, C.L., Cronquist, A., Ownbey, M., and Thompson, J.W. 1955. Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part V. Univ. of Wash. Press (Seattle). 343 pp.Google Scholar
5. Klingman, D.L., and Shaw, W.C. 1967. Using phenoxy herbicides effectively. U.S. Dep. Agric. Farmers' Bull. 2183. 24 pp.Google Scholar
6. Maguire, J.D., and Overland, A. 1959. Laboratory germination of seeds of weedy and native plants. Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 349. 15 pp.Google Scholar
7. May, J.W., and Hepworth, H.M. 1966. New chemical for control of bluebell, black medic, and yarrow in bluegrass turf. Colo. Agric. Exp. Stn. Pamphlet 7-S. 2 pp.Google Scholar
8. May, J.W., Hepworth, H.M., and Fults, J.M. 1968. A test of picloram and dicamba for control of certain range weeds in northwestern Colorado. Res. Prog. Report, West. Soc. Weed Sci., pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
9. Reed, C.F. 1970. Selected Weeds of the United States. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Handbook 366. 463 pp.Google Scholar