Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:23:55.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination and Viability of Common Crupina (Crupina vulgaris) Achenes Buried in the Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald C. Thill ,
David L. Zamora  and
Donald L. Kambitsch
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
David L. Zamora
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald L. Kambitsch
Affiliation:
E. I. DuPont Co., Inc., Kennewick, WA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of depth (0 to 20 cm) and duration (1 to 31 months) of burial on the deterioration, germination, and viability of common crupina (Crupina vulgaris Cass. ♯ CJNVU) was investigated in the field. Germination and decay of achenes prior to removal from the field were greater at 0- to 10- (7%) and 0- to 15- (21%) cm burial depths than at the 20-cm burial depth for 1980 and 1981 seedlots, respectively. After 25 months of burial, 41 and 26% of the achenes had not deteriorated for the 1980 and 1981 seedlots, respectively. Germination was greatest for nondeteriorated achenes recovered from 3- and 20-cm (63%) and least for the 10-cm burial depth (44%). Common crupina achenes recovered from the field over 25 months of burial exhibited a pronounced periodicity of germination, which was related to induced winter dormancy. The viability of achenes decreased linearly from 90 to near 0% over 31 months of burial.

Keywords

Tetrazolium analysisburial depthseed agingeradicationCJNVU
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 344 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barton, L. V. 1945. Respiration and germination studies of seed in moist storage. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 46:185–208.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., LeTourneau, D., and Erickson, L. C. 1961. The chemical composition of medusahead and downy brome. Weeds 9:307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seeds after 2.5 years in a 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 26:230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Europeae, Flora. 1976. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, England. 4:301.Google Scholar
5. Marcet, A. F. 1953. Flora Montserratina. Bol. Soc. Espanols Hist. Nat. 47:307–333.Google Scholar
6. Miller, T. L. and Thill, D. C. 1983. Today's Weed: Common Crupina. Weeds Today. 14(3):10–11.Google Scholar
7. Patterson, D. T. 1984. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on common crupina (Crupina vulgaris Cass.). Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Stickney, P. F. 1972. Crupina vulgaris (Compositae: Cynaceae), new to Idaho and North America. Madrono 21:402.Google Scholar
9. Taylorson, R. B. 1970. Changes in dormancy and viability of weed seeds in soils. Weed Sci. 18:265–269.Google Scholar
10. Tetrazolium Committee of Association of Official Seed Analysis. 1970. Page 62 in Grabe, D. F., ed. Tetrazolium Testing, Handb. for Agric. Seed. No. 29.Google Scholar
11. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1973. Economically important foreign weeds. Potential problems in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. No. 498. 629 pp.Google Scholar
12. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1969. Population dynamics of downy brome. Weed Sci. 17:20–26.Google Scholar