Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:25:53.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Variation in Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak ,
Jodie S. Holt  and
Norman C. Ellstrand
Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
Jodie S. Holt
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
Norman C. Ellstrand
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic diversity within and among populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) was analyzed to evaluate and quantify the genetic consequences of the reported predominance of asexually-produced tubers as colonizing agents. Ten populations were examined using starch gel electrophoresis for allozyme analysis. Four populations of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPRO) were surveyed for comparison. Twelve loci were identified in yellow nutsedge among the eight enzyme systems examined; ten of these loci were found in purple nutsedge. Yellow nutsedge showed relatively low genetic diversity. Most of the genetic diversity occurred as differences among individuals within populations (Hs), compared to differences among populations (Dst) for the four variable loci identified in this species. Thus, most genetic distances between its populations were small. Generally, only a few genotypes occurred within each population. Purple nutsedge was found to possess even lower within- and among-population gene and genotypic diversity. This study supports the view that tubers account for most of the establishment of new populations of both species.

Keywords

Clonal reproductionseed reproductionisozyme analysispurple nutsedgeCyperus rotundusCYPESCYPRO
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 506 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, T. F. 1975. The problem: Yellow nutsedge. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:120–121.Google Scholar
2. Baker, H. G. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Springs Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24:177–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bell, R. S., Lachman, W. H., Rahn, E. M., and Sweet, R. D. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast. 1. Nutgrass. Rhode Island Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 364. 33 pp.Google Scholar
4. Brown, A. H.D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 15:1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burdon, J. J. and Marshall, D. R. 1981. Biological control and the reproductive mode of weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Clayton, J. W. and Trietiak, D. N., 1972. Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29:1169–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Costa, J. and Appleby, A. P. 1976. Response of two yellow nutsedge varieties to three herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ellstrand, N. C. and Roose, M. L. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gottlieb, L. D. 1977. Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Annals Missouri Bot. Gardens 64:161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7:1–46.Google Scholar
11. Hamrick, J. L., Linhart, Y. B., and Mitton, J. B. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hauser, E. W. 1968. Yellow nutsedge – Problems, research trends and outlook. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 22:37–48.Google Scholar
13. Hill, E. R., Lachman, W. H., and Maynard, D. N. 1963. Reproductive potential of yellow nutsedge by seed. Weeds 11:160–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Holm, L. G., Plunckett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. Pages 125–133.Google Scholar
15. Horak, M. J. and Holt, J. S. 1986. Isozyme variability and breeding systems in populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34:538–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Justice, O. L. and Whitehead, M. D. 1946. Seed production, viability, and dormancy in the nutgrasses Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus . J. Agric. Res. 73:303–318.Google Scholar
17. Keeley, P. E., Miller, J. H., Kempen, H. M., and Hoover, M. 1975. Survey of weeds on cotton farms in the San Joaquin Valley. Proc. Calif. Weed Control Conf. 27:39–48.Google Scholar
18. Levin, D. A. 1975. Genetic heterozygosity and protein polymorphism among local populations of Oenothera biennis . Genetics 79:477–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Levin, D. A. and Kerster, H. W. 1971. Neighborhood structure in plants under diverse reproductive methods. Am. Natur. 105:345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Loveless, M. D. and Hamrick, J. L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Lyman, J. C. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Clonal diversity in Taraxacum officinale (Compositae), an apomict. Heredity 53:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Matthiesen, R. L. and Stoller, E. W. 1979. Tuber composition in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) variants. Weed Res. 18:373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Mulligan, G. H. and Junkins, B. E. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. 17. Cyperus esculentus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:3321–3323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Nei, M. 1975. Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. North-Holland Publishng Co., Amsterdam. 288 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
26. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Slack, C. H. and Hayes, R. M., 1978. Control of yellow nutsedge in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:18.Google Scholar
28. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1962. The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon. 11:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Sokal, R. R. and Sneath, P.H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. 359 pp.Google Scholar
30. Stoller, E. W. 1974. Growth, development, and physiology of yellow nutsedge. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:124–125.Google Scholar
31. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Swofford, D. L. and Selander, R. B. 1981. Biosys–1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72:281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1979. Seed production and germination in Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus . Weed Sci. 27:502–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Vrecenar-Gadus, M. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Independent assortment of four isozyme loci in the ‘Bacon’ avocado (Persea americana Mill.). Calif. Avocado Soc. Yearbook 68:173–177.Google Scholar
35. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 511 pp.Google Scholar