Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:18:54.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field persistence of bioavailable flumetsulam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw  and
Glen P. Murphy
Glen P. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted in 1994 and 1995 to monitor the dissipation of flumetsulam in five Mississippi soils for a period of 16 wk. These soils allowed evaluation of flumetsulam persistence across three soil series with a relatively constant soil pH of 6.0, as well as across three soils of varied pH from 6.0 to 7.6 within a constant soil series. Bioavailability was determined with a rice root length bioassay. Predicted half-lives ranged from 20 to 26 d in 1994 and from 23 to 46 d in 1995. Persistence decreased with increasing cumulative rainfall and decreasing organic matter content (within a range of 1.2 to 3.5%). Soil pH had no measurable effect on flumetsulam persistence.

Keywords

Flumetsulam, N-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-5-methyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-2-sulfonamiderice, Oryza sativa (L.)Dissipationbioassaysoil organic mattersoil pH
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , August 1997 , pp. 568 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. L. and Barrett, M. R. 1985. Residual phytotoxicity of chlorsulfuron in two soils. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 111–114.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. and Humburg, N. E. 1987. Field duration of chlorsulfuron bioactivity in the central Great Plains. J. Environ. Qual. 16: 263–266.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. and McKercher, R. B. 1989. Soil residual properties of DPX-A7881 under laboratory conditions. Weed Sci. 37: 412–418.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonylureas. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicide Chemistry. Degradation and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel-Dekker, pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Blacklow, W. M. and Pheloung, P. C. 1991. Sulfonylurea herbicides applied to acidic sandy soils: a bioassay for residues and factors affecting recoveries. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 1205–1216.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. L., and O'Connor, G. A. 1985. Soil Chemistry. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 210–233.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftherohorinos, I. G. and Kotoula-Syka, E. 1989. Field persistence of chlorsulfuron and DPX-L5300 in relation to rotational crops. Weed Res. 29: 127–134.Google Scholar
Fontain, D. D., Lehmann, R. G., and Miller, J. R. 1991. Soil adsorption of neutral and anionic forms of a sulfonamide herbicide, flumetsulam. J. Environ. Qual. 20: 759–762.Google Scholar
Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Tanaka, F. S. 1993. Metabolism of flumetsulam (DE-498) in wheat, corn, and barley. Pestic. Biochem. Phy. 45: 178–192.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34: 328–332.Google Scholar
Gerwick, B. C. and Kleschick, W. A. 1991. DE-498: a new broadspectrum herbicide for soybean and other crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 31: 10.Google Scholar
Hemmamda, S., Calmon, M., and Calmon, J. P. 1994. Kinetics and hydrolysis mechanisms of chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron-methyl. Pestic. Sci. 40: 71–76.Google Scholar
Kleschick, W. A., Gerwick, B. C., Carson, C. M., Monte, W. T., and Sanders, S. W. 1992. DE-498, a new acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicide with multicrop selectivity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40: 1083–1085.Google Scholar
Lehmann, R. G., Miller, J. R., Fontaine, D. D., Laskowski, D. A., Hunter, J. H., and Cordes, R. C. 1992. Degradation of a sulfonamide herbicide as a function of soil sorption. Weed Res. 32: 197–205.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1997. Field mobility of flumetsulam in three Mississippi soils. Weed Sci. 45: 564–567.Google Scholar
Ogram, A. V., Jessup, R. E., Ou, L. T., and Rao, P. S. 1985. Effects of sorption on biological degradation rates of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 582–587.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1994. Chlorimuron and imazaquin persistence in selected Southern soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 42: 635–640.Google Scholar
Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33: 558–563.Google Scholar
Vencil, W. K. and Banks, P. A. 1994. Dissipation of chlorimuron in Southern soils. Weed Sci. 42: 625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar