Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:09:38.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Competition Between Tall Morningglory and Soybean. II. Development and Distribution of Root Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. D. Scott  and
L. R. Oliver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the development and distribution of root systems of intraspecific and interspecific competition were conducted between soybean [Glycine max. (L.) Merr. ‘Lee 68′] and tall morningglory [Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth]. Tall morningglory at three plant densities and soybean were grown for 2 yr on a Taloka silt loam. The greatest density of soybean and tall morningglory roots grown under intraspecific competition was in the surface 12 cm and in the center of the row. Greater values of root length and density were during the dryer season. The largest fraction of total root length at a given date also was in the surface 12 cm and decreased with depth. The fraction at a given depth was a dynamic property of the root system during the growing season. When compared with the soybean root system, tall morningglory roots were found at deeper depths and had greater root densities. Little expansion of the soybean root system was found after initiation of the soybean reproductive phase. During this phase, the tall morningglory root system was increasing at a faster rate of growth than the soybean root system. The greatest density of roots grown under interspecific competition also was in the surface 12 cm and at the center of the row. These values were less than those found under intraspecific competition. Root distribution and development are dynamic functions of growth stage, planting density, and plant species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , September 1976 , pp. 454 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bloodworth, M.D., Burleson, C.A., and Cauley, W.R. 1958. Root distribution of some irrigated crops using undisrupted soil cores. Agron. J. 50:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davis, R.G., Johnson, W.C., and Wood, R.E. 1967. Weed root profiles. Agron. J. 59-555–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Evetts, L.L. and Burnside, O.C. 1974. Root distribution and vegetative propagation of Asclepias syriaca L. Weed Res. 14:283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fehrenbacher, J.B., Ray, B.W., and Alexander, J.D. 1967. Root development of corn, soybeans, wheat, and meadow in some contrasting Illinois soils. Illinois Res. 9:3.Google Scholar
5. Foth, H.D. 1962. Root and top growth of corn. Agron. J. 54:49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hall, N.S., Chandler, W.F., van Bavel, C.H.M., Reid, P.H., and Anderson, J.H. 1953. A tracer technique to measure growth and activity of plant root systems. North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul 101. 40 pp.Google Scholar
7. Khasawneh, F.E. and Copeland, J.P. 1973. Cotton root growth and uptake of nutrients; relation of phosphorus uptake to quantity, intensity, and buffering capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kiltz, B.F. 1930. Perennial weeds which spread vegetatively. Agron. J. 22:216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mengel, D.B. and Barber, S.A. 1974. Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agron. J. 66:341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mitchell, R.L. and Russell, W.J. 1971. Root development and rooting patterns of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) evaluated under field conditions. Agron. J. 63:313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Nakayama, F.S. and van Bavel, C.H.M. 1963. Root activity distribution patterns of sorghum and soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 55:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Nelson, W.W. and Allmaras, R.R. 1969. An improved monolith method for excavating and describing roots. Agron. J. 61:751–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Newman, E.I. 1966. A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3:139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Oliver, L.R., Frans, R.E., and Talbert, R.E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth Analysis. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Pavlychenko, T.K. 1937. Quantitative study of the entire root systems of weed and crop plants under field conditions. Ecology 18:62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Pavlychenko, T.K. and Harrington, J.B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crops in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agric. 15:151–160.Google Scholar
17. Raper, C.D. and Barber, S.A. 1971. Rooting systems of soybeans. I. Difference in root morphology among varieties. Agron. J. 62:581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Reicosky, D.C., Millington, R.J., and Peters, D.B. 1970. A comparison of three methods for estimating root length. Agron. J. 62:451–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Taylor, H.M., Huck, H.G., Klepper, B., and Lund, Z.F. 1970. Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron. J. 62:807–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Teare, I.D., Kanemasu, E.T., Powers, W.L., and Jacobs, H.S. 1973. Water-use efficiency and its relation to crop canopy area, stomatal resistance and root distribution. Agron. J. 65:207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Weaver, J.E. 1926. Root development of field crops. McGraw-Hill, New York. 291 pp.Google Scholar