Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:40:50.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jason M. Swantek ,
Clay H. Sneller  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Jason M. Swantek
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Clay H. Sneller
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the field and greenhouse to evaluate the effects of cultivar and sulfentrazone rate on soybean injury and yield from soil-applied sulfentrazone and to determine soybean inheritance of sulfentrazone tolerance. Excessive rainfall and cool growing conditions in 1996 enhanced sulfentrazone injury and caused yield reduction in the susceptible cultivars ‘KS4895’ and ‘Hutcheson’ at 0.56 kg ai ha−1 and KS4895 at 0.42 kg ha−1. Yields of tolerant cultivars ‘Deltapine 3478’ and ‘Manokin’ were not reduced. Sulfentrazone at 0.42 kg ha−1 reduced soybean stand 17 and 35% for tolerant and susceptible cultivars, respectively. Field and greenhouse inheritance studies were conducted on plant families developed from two crosses: Manokin (tolerant) by ‘Asgrow A4715’ (susceptible) and ‘Northrup King S59–60’ (tolerant) by KS4895 (susceptible). The sulfentrazone tolerance of Manokin and Northrup King S59–60 appeared to be controlled by a single gene, with tolerance being dominant to susceptibility. The allelic relationship of tolerance from these two sources needs to be determined.

Keywords

Sulfentrazonesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Geneticsherbicide tolerancecultivar selection
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 271 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Blue Springs, MO 64014

References

Literature Cited

Dayan, F. E., Green, H. M., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996a. Postemergence activity of sulfentrazone: effects of surfactants and leaf surfaces. Weed Sci. 44: 797–803.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Duke, S. O., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45: 634–641.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996b. Physiological basis for differential sensitivity to sulfentrazone by sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis). Weed Sci. 44: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, S. O., Dayan, F. E., Yamamoto, M., Duke, M. V., and Reddy, K. N. 1996. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors—their current and future role. Proc. Int. Weed Control Congr. 3: 775–780.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.Google Scholar
FMC Corporation. 1993. Sulfentrazone (F6285) Technical Bulletin. Philadelphia, PA: FMC Corporation. 3 p.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Wehtje, G. R., and Walker, R. H. 1996. Sorption and mobility of sulfentrazone as affected by soil and pH. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 176.Google Scholar
Hancock, H. G. 1992. Weed spectrum of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 49.Google Scholar
Leung, L. Y., Lyga, J. W., and Robinson, R. A. 1991. Metabolism and distribution of the experimental triazolone herbicide F6285. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39: 1509–1514.Google Scholar
Morris, W. H., Shaw, D. R., and Webster, E. P. 1993. Evaluation of experimental soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46: 55.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Costello, R. W., and King, C. A. 1995. Weed control programs with sulfentrazone in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 73.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M. 1997. Weed Control and Soybean Tolerance with Sulfentrazone. . University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 183 p.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Influence of application method on soybean cultivar tolerance to sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 194.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. S., Jordan, D. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10: 762–765.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., Grey, T. L., and Spratlin, C. E. 1995. Soil effects of sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 224.Google Scholar
Zhaohu, L., Walker, R. H., and Wehtje, G. R. 1997. Laboratory studies for predicting response of soybean cultivars to sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 177–178.Google Scholar