Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:17:49.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Evaluation of ALS-Resistant Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in Georgia Peanut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Hannah C. Lindell
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant; Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
Eric P. Prostko
Affiliation:
Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793
Scott McElroy
Affiliation:
Professor in Weed Science and Turf, Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849
Jinesh D. Patel
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849
Jason D. Blankenship
Affiliation:
Former Randolph County Extension Agent, University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, P.O. Box 282, 413 Blakely Street, Cuthbert, GA 39840.
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton GA, 31793
Nicholas T. Basinger
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accounting for 53% of United States peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), Georgia is the top peanut-producing state with approximately 1.42 billion kg produced in 2023. Peanut producers often use the ALS imidazolinone herbicide imazapic but reduced yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) control was reported in Georgia peanuts after four-years of continuous imazapic use. This study aimed to determine the level of resistance (LD50, I50, and GR50), potential cross-resistance for the suspected resistant population, and identify the associated genetic mutations conferring resistance. A susceptible biotype was treated with 0, 0.0088, 0.0175, 0.035, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 kg ai ha-1, and a resistant biotype was sprayed with 0, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56, 1.13, 2.26, and 4.5 kg ai ha-1 of imazapic. To determine if the suspected resistant biotype was cross-resistant to halosulfuron-methyl, an ALS herbicide used to control nutsedge spp., both biotypes were treated with 0, 0.0117, 0.0233, 0.0466, 0.0933, 0.187, 0.373, and 0.746 g ai ha-1 of halosulfuron-methyl. Plants were rated for injury 7, 14, and 28 days after treatment (DAT), and above-ground biomass harvested at 28 DAT. For imazapic, LD50 was 0.041 and 1.503 kg ai ha-1 and the GR50 was estimated to be 0.0128 and 1.853 kg ai ha-1 for Sus and Res biotypes, respectively, indicating 36 and 145-fold increase in resistance of the Res biotype for I50 and GR50, respectively. Both biotypes responded similarly to applications of halosulfuron-methyl, with biomass reductionat rates greater than 0.023 kg ai ha-1. Transcriptome profiles revealed a mutation in the target-site gene of the resistant biotype, causing an amino acid substitution from Alanine to Valine at position 205 (Ala205Val). Growers should continue to rotate chemistries and implement integrated weed management approaches for control of C. esculentus as the use of imazapic over consecutive years has led to resistance in C. esculentus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America 2024