Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:36:43.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Allelopathic Cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) as an Aid to Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. H. Lockerman  and
A. R. Putnam
R. H. Lockerman
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
A. R. Putnam
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) accessions which had demonstrated allelopathy under controlled environmental conditions were evaluated in the field. Plant introduction (PI) 169391 suppressed proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) fresh weight and population 58 and 84%, respectively. Total overseeded and volunteer weed population was reduced 54% when grown in association with PI 169391. Plant introduction 169391 was approximately twice as effective as PI 285605 in suppressing proso millet growth. Inhibition of weed species did not occur consistently in the field. The allelopathic effect of cucumbers was suppressed during periods of increased rainfall. However, these tests demonstrated that allelopathic activity could be obtained under certain edaphic and environmental conditions.

Keywords

Allelopathykolinesbiological control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 54 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cubbon, M. H. 1925. Effects of a rye crop on the growth of grapes. J. Agron. 17:568.Google Scholar
2. Deschenes, J. M. 1973. Intraspecific competition in experimental populations of weeds. Can. J. Bot. 53:1415–1421.Google Scholar
3. Fay, P. K. and Duke, W. B. 1977. An assessment of allelopathic potential in Avena germ plasm. Weed Sci. 25:224–228.Google Scholar
4. Harper, J. L. and Gajic, D. 1961. Experimental studies of the mortality and plasticity of a weed. Weed Res. 1:91–104.Google Scholar
5. Palmbald, I. G. 1968. Competition in experimental populations of weeds with emphasis on the regulation of population size. Ecology 49:26–34.Google Scholar
6. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1974. Biological suppression of weeds: Evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumber. Science 18:370–372.Google Scholar
7. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press. New York. 353 pp.Google Scholar