Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:56:18.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. S. Hoveland ,
G. A. Buchanan  and
E. D. Donnelly
C. S. Hoveland
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
G. A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
E. D. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don, var. Serala) was planted in three field experiments at three seeding rates with four rates of S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate). Grass and broadleaf weed populations were reduced, but sericea was unaffected by vernolate incorporated preplant. Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield. This treatment permitted harvesting a cutting of hay the establishment year with only a minor effect on production the next year. The beneficial effect of vernolate on sericea yield continued the second year, mainly because sericea plants were better established and more vigorous. Sericea seeding rate did not affect weed competition or forage yield. A seeding rate of 11 kg/ha with 3.4 kg/ha vernolate was the most practical treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 21 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, R. Y. 1951. Sericea in conservation farming. U. S. Dep. Agr. Farmers Bull. 2033. 29 p.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1968. Control of weeds during establishment of sericea lespedeza. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 21:143–150.Google Scholar
3. Hoveland, C. S., Anthony, W. B., Harris, R. R., Mayton, E. L., and Burgess, H. E. 1969. Serala sericea, Coastal bermuda, Goar tall fescue grazing for beef cows in Alabama's Piedmont. Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. St. Bull. 388. 14 p.Google Scholar
4. Hunt, O. J., Hulburt, W. C., and Wagner, R. E. 1963. Development of field research equipment and evaluation of methods of establishing forage crops. U.S. Dep. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1279. 54 p.Google Scholar
5. Kerr, H. D. and Klingman, D. L. 1960. Weed control in establishing birdsfoot trefoil. Weeds 8:157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Patterson, R. M., Donnelly, E. D., and Gantt, C. W. 1967. Broadcast seed for best sericea stand. Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Highlights of Agr. Res. Vol. 14, No. 1. 16 p.Google Scholar
7. Wakefield, R. C. and Skaland, N. 1965. Effects of seeding rate and chemical weed control on establishment and subsequent growth of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Agron. J. 57:547–550.Google Scholar