Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:57:01.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Acifluorfen on Broadleaf Weeds. Times and Methods for Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steve D. Lee  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Steve D. Lee
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field tests, common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) was controlled at the one- and two-leaf stages with 0.3 kg/ha acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid}. Four-leaf common cocklebur required 1.1 kg/ha for comparable control. Acifluorfen at 0.6 and 0.8 kg/ha controlled 96 and 90% of entireleaf morningglory [Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. var. integriuscula] atone- and two-leaf stages, respectively, but control was reduced as plants aged. Dark applications (2100 h) were more effective than those at sun-up (0600 h) or midday (1200 h) in control of hemp sesbania [Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory], pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.), and smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.). Hour of application had no significant influence on control of common cocklebur or prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.). An increase in surfactant (80% alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene glycols) concentration enhanced acifluorfen control of entireleaf morningglory and Texas gourd [Cucurbita texana (A.) Gray] at the 0.3-kg/ha rate applied 2 weeks after emergence. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] injury was increased with the 1.1-kg/ha rate when surfactant concentration was increased from 0.5 to 0.75%. Increasing the spray volume increased pitted morningglory control but decreased hemp sesbania control. In the growth chamber, better control of pitted morningglory and common cocklebur was obtained at high (35 C day, 26 C night) than at low temperatures (27 C day, 18 C night) when plants were treated 1 week after emergence.

Keywords

Ipomoea spp.Amaranthus hybridusXanthium pensylvanicumSesbania exaltataSida spinosaCucurbita texanaAbutilon theophrastiGlycine maxtemperaturesurfactant
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , September 1982 , pp. 520 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. N. and Koukkari, W. L. 1979. Rhythmic leaf movements of some common weeds. Weed Sci. 27:401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1978. Broadleaf weed control in soybeans with acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:313.Google Scholar
3. Clor, M. A., Crafts, A. S., and Yamaguchi, S. 1962. Effect of high humidity on translocation of foliar-applied labeled compounds in plants. Part 1. Plant Physiol. 37:609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Comegys, W.R. and Ryan, J. B. 1979. Acifluorfen: Summary of postemergence weed control results in soybeans. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 19:128.Google Scholar
5. Fadayomi, O. and Warren, G. F. 1977. Uptake and translocation of nitrofen and oxyfluorfen. Weed Sci. 25:111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. State of development description for soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hayes, R. M. and Overton, J. R. 1979. Comparison of selected diphenylether herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:69.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon . Weed Sci. 27:448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kollman, G. E. and Yih, R. Y. 1978. Effects of spray additives on the postemergence activity of acifluorfen. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 18:13.Google Scholar
10. Manegot, B. L., Rieck, C. E., and Downs, J. P. 1977. Weed control in soybeans with RH-6201. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:50.Google Scholar
11. Manegot, B. L., Rieck, C. E., and Martin, J. R. 1978. Absorption and translocation of 14C RH-6201. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:240.Google Scholar
12. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1980. Control of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species in soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 28:409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. 1979. The effects of surfactant and environment on the toxicity of metriflufen to soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense . Weed Sci. 27:675–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Murdock, E. C., Gossett, B. J., and Musen, H. L. 1977. Influence of spray adjuvants on RH-6201 for weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:90.Google Scholar
15. Overton, J. R., Hayes, R. M., Jeffery, L. S., and McCutchen, T. C. 1979. Cocklebur control in soybeans with acifluorfen, bentazon, and dinoseb plus naptalam. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:119.Google Scholar
16. Prasad, R., Foy, C. L., and Crafts, A. S. 1967. Effects of relative humidity on adsorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 15:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the activity of acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 29:480–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Weaver, M. L. and Nylund, R. E. 1965. The susceptibility of annual grass weeds and Canada thistle to MCPA. Weeds 11:142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. William, R. D. and Warren, G. F. 1975. Suppression of Cyperus rotundus L. in carrots with night applications of nitrofen or herbicidal oil. Weed Res. 15:285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Yih, R. Y., Johnson, W. O., Kollman, G. E., and Swithenbank, C. 1977. RH-6201 (Blazer): A new broad spectrum herbicide for postemergence use in soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:285–286.Google Scholar