Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:00:38.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Tillage on Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Interference with Soybeans (Glycine max) and Soil Water Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Timothy N. Tripp
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Jerry W. Wells
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
John E. Hammel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Ento. Sci., Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 1980, 1981, and 1982 to evaluate the effect of tillage and sicklepod density on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOB) interference with soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and soil water use. In the absence of sicklepod, soybean yields were similar in nontilled plots covered with a straw mulch and in conventionally tilled plots with no mulch in all years. In the presence of sicklepod, higher soybean yields were obtained with the non-tilled-mulched plots than with the tilled plots at corresponding sicklepod densities and sicklepod fresh weights. Early soil water loss was greater in the tilled plots with increasing sicklepod density causing lower soil water content in both tillage treatments. Soil water depletion was greater in the no-till treatments during the soybean pod-filling stage.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashley, D. A. 1983. Soybeans. Pages 389422 in Teare, I. D. and Peet, M. M., eds. Crop-Water Relations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
2. Blevins, R. L., Cook, D., Phillips, G. H., and Phillips, R. E. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593596.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod and redroot pigweed with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:258262.Google Scholar
4. Campbell, G. S. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York. 159 pp.Google Scholar
5. Creel, J. M., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur and soybeans under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206212.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., Nichols, R. L., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Effects of florida beggarweed and sicklepod on peanut yield. Weed Sci. 30:602604.Google Scholar
8. Hill, L. V. and Santelmann, P. W. 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Sci. 17:12.Google Scholar
9. Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press, New York. 288 pp.Google Scholar
10. Jones, J. N., Moody, J. E., and Lillard, J. H. 1969. Effects of tillage, no tillage, and mulch on soil water and plant growth. Agron. J. 61:719721.Google Scholar
11. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520526.Google Scholar
12. Larson, W. E. and Osborne, G. J. 1982. Tillage accomplishments and potential. Pages 112 in Kral, D. M., ed. Predicting Tillage Effects on Soil Physical Properties and Processes. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
13. Palmer, R. D. 1980. Weed Survey–Southern States. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 33:186.Google Scholar
14. Perkins, H. F., Owen, V., Hammel, J. E., and Price, E. A. 1982. Soil characteristics of the plant science farm of the University of Georgia College Experiment Station. Ga. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 287. 42 pp.Google Scholar
15. Peters, D. B. 1960. Relative magnitude of evaporation and transpiration. Agron. J. 52:536539.Google Scholar
16. Phillips, R. E. 1982. Soil moisture. Pages 2342 in Phillips, R. E., Thomas, G. W., and Blevins, R. L., eds. No Tillage Research: Research Reports and Reviews. Univ. Ky., Lexington.Google Scholar
17. Phillips, S. H. 1982. No-tillage, past and present. Pages 15 in Phillips, R. E., Thomas, G. W., and Blevins, R. L., eds. No Tillage Research: Research Reports and Reviews. Univ. Ky., Lexington.Google Scholar
18. Shahi, H. N. 1978. Competitive effects of Chenopodium album for soil moisture and nutrients in wheat. Int. Pest Control 20:1417.Google Scholar
19. Stone, J. F. 1978. Evapotranspiration control on agricultural lands. Fla. Crop Sci. Soc. Proc. 37:110.Google Scholar
20. Stuart, B. L., Harrison, S. K., Abernathy, J. R., and Wendt, C. W. 1982. Water relations of cotton-pigweed competition. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:313314.Google Scholar
21. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod and coffee senna: geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:6871.Google Scholar
22. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar
23. Viets, F. G. 1962. Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Pages 223264 in Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 14. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
24. Walker, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. 30, Suppl. 1:1724.Google Scholar
25. Willatt, S. T. and Taylor, H. M. 1978. Water uptake by soybean roots as affected by their depth and by soil water content. J. Agric. Sci. 90:205213.Google Scholar
26. Witt, W. W. 1982. Weed control in no-tillage. Pages 96102 in Phillips, R. E., Thomas, G. W., and Blevins, R. L., eds. No Tillage Research: Research Reports and Reviews. Univ. Ky., Lexington.Google Scholar