Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:26:59.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Tillage and Rainfall on Atrazine Residue Levels in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Allan R. Isensee  and
Ali M. Sadeghi
Allan R. Isensee
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Environ. Chem. Lab., Bldg. 050, Beltsville, MD 20705
Ali M. Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Environ. Chem. Lab., Bldg. 050, Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 1987 to 1991 to determine the effect of tillage and rainfall on distribution of atrazine in soil. Soil samples (10-cm increments to 50 cm) and crop residue samples were taken at regular intervals after application each year and analyzed for atrazine. Crop residue and living vegetation on no-till plots intercepted 60 to 70% of the applied atrazine; 3 to 16% of the atrazine remained in crop residue 1 to 2 wk later. The amount of atrazine recovered in soil, 1 to 2 wk posttreatment, ranged from 22 to 59 and 47 to 73% of the amount applied for no-till and conventional till, respectively. An average of 2.6 times more atrazine was recovered in the surface 10 cm of soil under conventional till than under no-till for all samplings and years. Total amounts of atrazine in the sampled profile (0- to 50-cm depth) were also generally lower under no-till than conventional till. More leaching below 10 cm occurred under no-till than conventional till, particularly in 1988 and 1990 when rain fell soon after application. Variation in soil atrazine levels among years was related to timing and amount of the first and subsequent rainfall after application.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineNo-tillconventional tilldegradationdissipationhalf-life
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 462 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1984. The fate of oryzalin applied to straw-mulched and nonmulched soils. Weed Sci. 32:269–272.Google Scholar
3. Czapar, G. F., Horton, R., and Fawcett, R. S. 1992. Herbicide and tracer movement in soil columns containing an artificial macropore. J. Environ. Qual. 21:110–115.Google Scholar
4. Dick, W. A., Roseberg, R. J., McCoy, E. L., Edwards, W. M., and Haghiri, F. 1989. Surface hydrologic response of soils to no-tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1520–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Edwards, W. M., Shipitalo, M. J., Dick, W. A., and Owens, L. B. 1992. Rainfall intensity affects transport of water and chemicals through macropores in no-till soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:52–58.Google Scholar
6. Flint, J. L., Witt, W. W., Martin, J. R., and Barrett, M. 1989. Dissipation of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and chlorimuron in three soybean tillage systems. Pages 154–158 in Pesticides in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments, 1990, Weigmann, D. L., ed. Virginia Water Resources Res. Ctr., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
7. Foy, C.L. and Hiranpradit, H. 1989. Movement of atrazine by water from application sites in conventional and no-tillage corn production. Pages 355–377 in Pesticides in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments, 1990, Weigmann, D. L., ed. Virginia Water Resources Res. Ctr., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
8. Ghadiri, H., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1984. Interception and retention of atrazine by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble. Weed Sci. 32:24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gish, T. J., Isensee, A. R., Nash, R. G., and Helling, C. S. 1991. Impact of pesticides on shallow groundwater quality. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 34:1745–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hall, J. K., Murray, M. R., and Hartwig, N. L. 1989. Herbicide leaching and distribution in tilled and untilled soil. J. Environ. Qual. 18:439–445.Google Scholar
11. Isensee, A. R., Nash, R. G., and Helling, C. S. 1990. Effect of conventional vs. no-tillage on pesticide leaching to shallow groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 19:434–440.Google Scholar
12. Jones, R. E. Jr., Banks, P. A., and Radcliffe, D. E. 1990. Alachlor and metribuzin movement and dissipation in a soil profile as influenced by soil surface conditions. Weed Sci. 38:589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Martin, C. D., Baker, J. L., Erbach, D. C., and Johnson, H. P. 1978. Washoff of herbicides applied to corn residue. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 33:1164–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:217–222.Google Scholar
15. Nash, R. G. and Beall, M. L. Jr. 1990. Soil mixer for a wide range of water contents. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:555–557.Google Scholar
16. Priebe, D. L. and Blackmer, A. M. 1989. Preferential movement of oxygen-18-labeled water and nitrogen- 15-labeled urea through macropores in a Nicollet soil. J. Environ. Qual. 18:66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shipitalo, M. J., Edwards, W. M., Dick, W. A., and Owens, L. B. 1990. Initial storm effects on macropore transport of surface-applied chemicals in no-till soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:1530–1536.Google Scholar
18. Sigua, G. C., Isensee, A. R., and Sadeghi, A. M. 1993. Influence of rainfall intensity and crop residue on leaching of atrazine in intact no-till soil cores. Soil Sci. 156:225–232.Google Scholar
19. Sorenson, B. A., Shea, P. J., and Roeth, F. W. 1991. Effects of tillage, application time and rate on metribuzin dissipation. Weed Res. 31:335–345.Google Scholar