Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:51:02.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Metribuzin on Net Photosynthesis of Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Yaw-Shing Yang
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol. and Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
S. Wayne Bingham
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol. and Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

The influence of metribuzin [4-ammo-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] on net photosynthesis of goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ♯3 ELEIN] and six cultivars of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. ♯ CYNDA cvs. ‘Common’, ‘Tufcote’, ‘Vamont’, and ‘Midiron’, Cynodon transvaalensis Davy., and Cynodon dactylon X Cynodon transvaalensis ‘Tifway’] was evaluated. Metribuzin rapidly inhibited carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake within 1 h after application in both goosegeass and bermudagrasses. Very often, net photosynthesis was completely inhibited. Net photosynthesis in goosegrass was inhibited by lower rates of metribuzin than those required for similar reduction in bermudagrasses. Common, Tufcote, Tifway, and C. transvaalensis bermudagrasses were less sensitive to metribuzin than Midiron and Vamont based upon the degree of inhibition of net photosynthesis, the rate of its recovery, and the level of foliar injury. Recovery from inhibition of net photosynthesis was observed in both species 24 h after treatment with low metribuzin rates. High rates caused several days lag period before net photosynthesis resumed. After 10 days, 95% of the goosegrass foliage was injured (either chlorosis or necrosis) from 2 kg ai/ha metribuzin treatment. The threshold concentration for inducing leaf injury in bermudagrasses was 1 kg ai/ha. Inhibition of photosynthesis was initially rapid in both grasses; however, recovery was evident earlier and there was less foliar injury in bermudagrasses than in goosegrass. Selective control of goosegrass in bermudagrass may therefore be partially dependent upon rapid metabolism and/or inactivation of metribuzin in the bermudagrass.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. van Assche, C. J. and Carles, P. M. 1982. Photosystem II inhibiting chemicals: molecular interaction between inhibitors and a common target. Pages 121 in Moreland, D. E., St. John, J. B., and Hess, F. D., eds. Biochemical response induced by herbicides. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 181. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, S. W. and Shaver, R. L. 1981. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control during bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) establishment. Weed Sci. 29:1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Fedtke, C. 1979. Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) plants to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 27:192195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hardcastle, W. S. 1974. Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybean. Weed Res. 14:181184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Heck, W. W., Philbeck, R. B., and Dunning, J. A. 1978. A continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system for exposing plants to gaseous air contaminants. USDA Agric. Res. Series 181. 32 pp.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, B. J. 1977. Crabgrass and goosegrass control in bermudagrass with herbicides. Ga. Agric. Res. Bull. No. 195. 29 pp.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, B. J. 1978. Tolerance of five bermudagrass cultivars to herbicide treatment. Ga. Agric. Res. Rep. No. 282. 19 pp.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, B. J. 1980. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Sci. 28:378381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnson, B. J. 1981. Response of bermudagrass turf to dates of metribuzin treatment. Ga. Agric. Res. Rep. No. 375. 5 pp.Google Scholar
10. Moshier, L. J. and Russ, O. G. 1981. Metribuzin injury in soybeans as influenced by application timing and cultivation. Agron. J. 73:677679.Google Scholar
11. van Oorschot, J. L. P. and van Leeuwen, P. H. 1979. Recovery from inhibition of photosynthesis by metamitron in various plant species. Weed Res. 19:6367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Pallett, K. E. and Dodge, A. D. 1980. Studies into the action of some photosynthetic inhibitor herbicides. J. Exp. Bot. 31:10511066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Schmidt, R. R. and Fedtke, C. 1977. Metamitron activity in tolerant and susceptible plants. Pestic. Sci. 8:611617.Google Scholar
14. da Silva, J. F. and Warren, G. F. 1976. Effect of stage of growth on metribuzin tolerance. Weed Sci. 24:612615.Google Scholar
15. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484486.Google Scholar
16. Yang, Y.-S., Skelly, J. M., Chevone, R. I., and Birch, J. B. 1983. Effects of short-term ozone exposure on net photosynthesis, dark respiration, and transpiration of three eastern white pine clones. Environ. Intl. 9:265269.Google Scholar