Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:29:46.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Herbicides on Weeds and Sweetcorn (Zea mays) Grown on Coarse-Textured Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
S. Drake
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350

Abstract

Alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 3.4 kg/ha, EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) + R-25788 (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide) at 4.5 + 0.4 and 9.0 + 0.8 kg/ha, vernolate (S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate) + R-25788 at 4.5 + 0.4 and 9.0 + 0.8 kg/ha, metolachlor [2-chloro N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] at 1.7 and 3.4 kg/ha, and metolachlor + procyazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(cyclopropylamino)1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile} at 1.3 + 1.3 kg/ha were preplant incorporated. These herbicides controlled 95% or more of the barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.], common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), Powell amaranth (A. powellii S. Wats.), and yellow foxtail [Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] without injuring sweetcorn (Zea mays L. ‘Golden Jubilee’) or reducing corn yields or quality. Similar results were obtained with preplant incorporated applications of butylate (S-ethyldiisobutylthiocarbamate) + R-25788 at 4.5 + 0.2 kg/ha followed by a postemergence application of the amine salt of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 0.6 kg/ha. Metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] at 0.3 and 0.6 kg/ha and metribuzin + alachlor at 0.6 + 2.2 kg/ha applied preplant and incorporated reduced corn stands, primary ear production, and corn yields significantly. None of the herbicides significantly affected total sugars, reducing sugars, soluble solids, moisture content, or succulence of the corn.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1970 Official Methods of Analysis, 11th ed. Washington, D.C. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:321325.Google Scholar
3. Elakkad, M. A. and Behrens, R. 1975. Canada thistle competition with corn and soybeans. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. 30:114.Google Scholar
4. Kapoor, P. 1975. Weed-crop behavior in pure and mixed stands of maize and Echinochloa colona Link. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 83(5):175194.Google Scholar
5. Kramer, A. and Coolee, J. C. 1962. An instrumental method for measuring quality of raw and canned sweet corn. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 81:421427.Google Scholar
6. Nieto, J. H., Brondo, M. A., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS (c) 14(2):159166.Google Scholar
7. Nieto, J. H. and Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. J. 53:15.Google Scholar