Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:08:19.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) on Growth, Yield, and Nutrient Status of Transplanted Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Prasanta C. Bhowmik  and
Krishna N. Reddy
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the effects of various barnyardgrass populations on growth, yield, and nutrient concentration of transplanted “Jetstar’ tomato. Barnyardgrass densities at 16, 32, and 64 plants/m tomato row were tested in 1982 and 1983. Barnyardgrass shoot fresh weights/unit area increased as density increased. Fresh weight of barnyardgrass shoots ranged from 17 100 kg/ha at 16 plants/m of row to 35 500 kg/ha at 64 plants/m of row. At the vegetative stage, tomato shoot dry weight was unaffected by barnyardgrass. As crop growth progressed, tomato shoot dry weight decreased at all barnyardgrass densities. Season-long interference of barnyardgrass reduced marketable tomato fruit number and fruit weight at all densities compared to weed-free plots. Reductions in marketable fruit weight ranged from 26% to 16 plants/m row to 84% at 64 plants/m row. In 1982, concentrations of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in tomato shoots were unaffected by season-long interference of barnyardgrass at all densities. However, in 1983, concentrations of N and K decreased and concentration of P increased in tomato leaves as the density of barnyardgrass increased. Concentrations of Ca and Mg in tomato leaves were unaltered by barnyardgrass density.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGtomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Jetstar’Competitiondensity effectinterferenceECHCG
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , November 1988 , pp. 775 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhowmik, P. C. and Reddy, K. N. 1988. Interference of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technol. 2:505–508.Google Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugarbeets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.Google Scholar
3. Greweling, T. 1976. Chemical analyses of plant tissue. Search. New York Agric. Exp. Stn. 6:1–33.Google Scholar
4. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. Page 32–40.Google Scholar
5. Miller, G. R. and Meggitt, W. F. 1962. Competition of weeds with sugarbeets. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 19:21.Google Scholar
6. Mohammed, E. S. and Sweet, R. D. 1978. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) competition studies. I. Influence of plant densities. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 38.Google Scholar
7. Mohammed, E. S. and Sweet, R. D. 1978. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) competition studies. II. Influence of moisture, nutrients, and light. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 38.Google Scholar
8. Monaco, T. J., Grayson, A. S., and Sanders, D. C. 1981. Influence of four weed species on the growth, yield, and quality of direct-seeded tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 29:394–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sanders, D. C., Grayson, A. S., and Monaco, T. J. 1981. Mineral content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and four competing weed species. Weed Sci. 29:590–593.Google Scholar
10. Stubblefield, F. M. and DeTurk, E. E. 1940. Effect of ferric sulfate in shortening Kjeldahl digestion. Ind. and Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 12:396–399.Google Scholar
11. Vengris, J., Kacperska-Palacz, A. E., and Livingston, R. B. 1966. Growth and development of barnyardgrass in Massachusetts. Weeds 14:299–301.Google Scholar