Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:37:14.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Additives on the Efficacy, Uptake, and Translocation of the Methyl Ester of Thifensulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Fielding
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Univ. Illinois, and Plant Physiol., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron. Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Univ. Illinois, and Plant Physiol., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron. Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Effects of a 28% N solution containing urea and ammonium nitrate (28% UAN) on field efficacy of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron and combinations of thifensulfuron and the methyl ester of chlorimuron were investigated. Velvetleaf control and soybean injury increased as rates of thifensulfuron increased (0, 2.2, 4.4, and 5.8 g ai/ha) and as rates of chlorimuron increased (0, 4.4, and 8.8 g ai/ha). Treatments that included 28% UAN at 9 L/ha controlled velvetleaf 9% better, averaged across herbicides and rates 21 days after treatment (DAT), but also increased soybean injury. Thifensulfuron applications controlled common lambsquarters well, but control was not affected by additions of 28% UAN. In studies where 14C-thifensulfuron was applied without an additive to the second true leaf of growth-chamber-grown velvetleaf, less than 4% of that applied was absorbed 84 h after treatment (HAT), whereas treatments that included nonionic surfactant or 28% UAN absorbed 33 and 45%, respectively. When both nonionic surfactant and 28% UAN were added, plants absorbed 76% 84 HAT. Translocation 84 HAT was also greatest with both additives and the majority moved to tissues above treated leaves. The 28% UAN increased uptake of thiameturon regardless of soil fertility level.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amuti, K. S., Claus, J. S., and Maxcy, F. B. 1987. DPX-M6316: Postemergence herbicide for soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 42:45.Google Scholar
2. Babiker, A.G.T. and Duncan, H. J. 1975. Penetration of bracken fronds by amitrole as influenced by pre-spraying conditions, surfactants and other additives. Weed Res. 15:123127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blair, A. M. 1975. The addition of ammonium salts or a phosphate ester to herbicides to control Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 15:101105.Google Scholar
4. Brady, H. A. 1970. Ammonium nitrate and phosphoric acid increase 2,4,5-T absorption by tree leaves. Weed Sci. 18:204206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and Venice mallow (Hibiscus triomum) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 24:224228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Foy, C. L. and Smith, L. W. 1969. The role of surfactants in modifying the activity of herbicidal sprays. Pages 5559 in Pesticidal Formulations Research. Am. Chem. Soc., Adv. in Chem. Series 86. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
7. Hagood, D. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L., and Schreiber, M. M., 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729734.Google Scholar
8. Hammerton, J. L. 1974. Weed control work in progress at the University of the West Indies Part 4. PANS 20:429436.Google Scholar
9. Jansen, L. L. 1964. Surfactant enhancement of herbicide entry. Weeds 12:251255.Google Scholar
10. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381405.Google Scholar
11. Koppatschek, F., Liebl, R., and Wax, L. 1986. Fertilizer additives for acifluorfen and bentazon. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:46.Google Scholar
12. Lueschen, W. E. and Hoverstad, T. R. 1986. Soybean injury and weed control as influenced by additives for postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:55.Google Scholar
13. Martin, A. R. 1987. Fertilizer additives with postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 42:42.Google Scholar
14. Mitchell, J. W. and Linder, P. J. 1950. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4-DI by bean plants as affected by cosolvents and surface agents. Science 112:5455.Google Scholar
15. Mohan, R. G. and Rathmann, D. P. 1986. Addition of spray adjuvants and 2,4-DB to acifluorfen, bentazon and fertilizer combinations in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:45.Google Scholar
16. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T., and Hons, F. M. 1987. Soybean (Glycine max)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interspecific competition. Weed Sci. 35:647653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczewski, K. A. 1988. Thiameturon phytotoxicity to kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 36:296300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hamman, W. M. 1981. Influence of nonionic surfactants, ammonium sulphate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391400.Google Scholar
19. Owen, M.D.K. 1986. Effects of application timing and herbicide additives on efficacy of herbicides applied postemergence for soybean weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:40.Google Scholar
20. Petersen, P. J., Haderlie, L. C., Hoefer, R. H., and McAllister, R. S. 1985. Dicamba absorption and translocation as influenced by formulation and surfactant. Weed Sci. 33:717720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Ruizzo, M. A. and Gorski, S. F. 1987. Effect of adjuvants on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) sensitivity to quizalofop. Weed Sci. 35:559563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Hess, F. D. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 34:811816.Google Scholar
23. Staniforth, D. W. and Loomis, W. E. 1949. Surface action in 2,4-D sprays. Science 109:628629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Suwunnamek, U. and Parker, C. 1975. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulphate and other additives. Weed Res. 15:1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Szabo, S. S. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1961. Penetration of living and nonliving surfaces by 2,4-D as influenced by ionic additives. Weeds 9:177184.Google Scholar
26. Temple, R. E. and Hilton, H. W. 1963. The effect of surfactants on the water solubility of herbicides, and the foliar phytotoxicity of surfactants. Weeds 11:297299.Google Scholar
27. Turner, D. J. and Loader, M.P.C. 1984. Effect of ammonium sulphate and related salts on the phytotoxicity of dichlorprop and other herbicides used for broadleaved weed control in cereals. Weed Res. 24:6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Turner, D. J. and Loader, M.P.C. 1975. Further studies with additives: effects of phosphate esters and ammonium salts on the activity of leafapplied herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 6:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Willingham, G. L. and Graham, L. L. 1988. Influence of environmental factors and adjuvants on the foliar penetration of acifluorfen in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti): An analysis using the fractional factorial design. Weed Sci. 36:824829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Wilson, B. J. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram activity and absorption. Weed Sci. 23:289296.Google Scholar
31. Wilson, B. J. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram absorption by detached leaves. Weed Sci. 23:297301.Google Scholar