Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:22:30.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Three Formulations on Uptake and Efficacy of Copper in Hydrilla verticillata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lars W.J. Anderson
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS Aquatic Weeds Res. Lab. Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
Nathan Dechoretz
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS Aquatic Weeds Res. Lab. Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
David Bayer
Affiliation:
Botany Dep., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
Gary L. Darmstadt
Affiliation:
Botany Dep., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616

Abstract

Copper content and growth of excised hydrilla [Dioecious Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle # HYLLI] apical shoot segments were determined following exposure to copper sulfate (CuSO4), copper-triethanolamine (Cu-TEA), and copper-ethylenediamine (Cu-EDA). For all copper formulations, inhibition of growth was related to the amount of copper associated with the excised shoots. At equal copper exposure, the Cu-EDA formulation produced the greatest inhibition of growth and generally the highest copper levels in the plants. The Cu-EDA formulation inhibited dry weight gain by more than 80% 3 weeks after a 2-h exposure to 2.0 or 4.0 ppmw copper. Under similar conditions, CuSO4 or Cu-TEA produced 60% inhibition. The presence or absence of light during a 2-h exposure had no effect on the efficacy of uptake of copper from any of the formulations. Formulation-dependent differences in the mechanism of copper uptake is suggested because rinsing of exposed shoots with dilute acid (0.01N HNO3) removed copper from shoots treated with CuSO4 or Cu-TEA but not from those treated with Cu-EDA.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technolgy
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, L.W.J. and Dechoretz, N. 1982. Growth, reproduction and control of Hydrilla verticillata Royle (L.f.) in an irrigation system in southwestern U.S. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. on Aquat. Weeds. pp. 5461.Google Scholar
2. Arnold, W. R. 1979. Fluridone — a new aquatic herbicide. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 17:3033.Google Scholar
3. Bartley, T. R. 1976. Investigations of copper sulfate for aquatic weed control. U.S. Dep. Int. Res. Rep. No. 27, 24 pp.Google Scholar
4. Blackburn, R. D. and Weldon, L. W. 1970. Control of Hydrilla verticillata . Hyacinth Control J. 8:49.Google Scholar
5. Blustein, H. and Shaw, R. F. 1981. Characterization of copper binding capacity in lake water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:11001102.Google Scholar
6. Brown, B. T. and Rattigan, B. M. 1979. Toxicity of soluble copper and other metal ions to Elodea canadensis . Environ. Pollut. 13:303314.Google Scholar
7. Butler, N., Haskew, A.E.J., and Young, M. M. 1980. Copper tolerance in the green alga Chlorella vulgaris . Plant Cell Environ. 3:119126.Google Scholar
8. Button, K. and Hostetter, H. P. 1977. Copper sorption and release by Cyclotella menegbiniana (bacillariophyceae) and Chlamydomonas reinharadii (Chlorophycease). J. Phycol. 13:198202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Foster, P. L. 1977. Copper exclusion as a mechanism of heavy metal tolerance in a green alga. Nature 269:322323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Francke, J. A. and Hillebrand, H. 1980. Effects of copper on some filamentous chlorophyta. Aquat. Bot. 8:285289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Frank, P. A., Dechoretz, N., and Raines, R. W. 1979. Combinations of diquat and several cations for control of Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata). Weed Sci. 27:115118.Google Scholar
12. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347.Google Scholar
13. Nakajima, A., Horikoshi, T., and Sakaguchi, T. 1981. Distribution and chemical state of heavy metal ions absorbed by Chlorella cells. Agric. Biol. Chem. 45:903908.Google Scholar
14. Perlmutter, N. L. and Lembi, C. A. 1977. Resistance of the green alga Cladophora to copper sulfate. WSSA Proc. Page 87 (Abstract).Google Scholar
15. Rauser, W. 1984. Copper-binding protein and copper tolerance in Agreostis gigantea . Plant Sci., Lett. 33:239247.Google Scholar
16. Sandmann, G. and Boger, P. 1980. Copper deficiency and toxicity in Scenedesmus . Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 98:5359.Google Scholar
17. Steward, K. K., Van, T. K., Carter, V., and Pieterse, A. 1984. Hydrilla invades Washington D.C. and the Potomac. Am. J. Bot. 71:162165.Google Scholar
18. Stiff, M. J. 1971. Copper/bicarbonate equilibria in solutions of bicarbonate at concentrations similar to those found in natural water. Water Res. 5:171175.Google Scholar
19. Sutton, D. L. and Blackburn, R. D. 1971. Uptake of copper in hydrilla. Weed Res. 11:4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Sutton, D. L., Haller, W. T., Steward, K. K., and Blackburn, R. D. 1972. Effect of copper on uptake of diquat 14C by hydrilla. Weed Sci. 20:581583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sutton, D. L., Blackburn, R. D., and Barlowe, W. C. 1971. Response of aquatic plants to combinations of endothall and copper. Weed Sci. 19:643646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sutton, D. L., Blackburn, R. D., and Steward, K. K. 1971. Influence of herbicides on the uptake of copper in hydrilla. Weed Res. 11:99105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Sutton, D. L., Weldon, L. W., and Blackburn, R. D. 1970. Effect of diquat on uptake of copper in aquatic plants. Weed Sci. 18:703707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Sylva, R. N. 1976. The environmental chemistry of copper in aquatic systems. Water Res. 10:789792.Google Scholar
25. Van Cutsem, P. and Gillet, C. 1982. Activity coefficients and selectivity values of Cu++, Zn++ and Ca++ ions adsorbed in the Nitella flexilus L. cell wall during triangular ion exchanges. J. Exp. Bot. 33:847853.Google Scholar
26. Van DerWerff, M. and Ernst, W.H.O. 1979. Kinetics of copper and zinc uptake by leaves and roots of an aquatic plant, Elodea nutallii . Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 92:110.Google Scholar
27. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Pages 110118.Google Scholar