Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:03:37.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Soybean (Glycine max) Interference on Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Laura S. Quakenbush  and
Robert N. Andersen
Laura S. Quakenbush
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Robert N. Andersen
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When grown without soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] interference, eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun.) planted in May produced as many as 7000 berries and 800000 seeds per plant. Eastern black nightshade planted in mid-July produced as many as 100 berries, but those planted in mid-August failed to produce berries. Eastern black nightshade produced less than 85 berries per plant when planted with soybeans in May, 0 to 3 berries per plant when planted into soybeans in June, and no berries when planted into soybeans in July. However, when soybeans were defoliated in July to simulate hail injury, eastern black nightshade that had been planted with soybeans in May produced up to 1600 berries per plant, and those planted into the defoliated soybeans in July produced up to 58 berries per plant. We suggest, therefore, that in vigorously growing soybeans, control of eastern black nightshade emerging in the row would only be required through June to prevent berry production. If, however, the soybean canopy were disturbed by hail or other factors, eastern black nightshade seedlings emerging in late July or early August might produce berries by soybean harvest.

Keywords

HaildefoliationcompetitionSOLNI
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , September 1984 , pp. 638 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burgert, K. L., Burnside, O. C., and Fenster, C. R. 1973. Black nightshade leaves its mark. Farm, Ranch, and Home, Quarterly (University of Nebraska). 20(3):8–10.Google Scholar
2. Jones, C. W. and Kennedy, B. W. 1981. Potential storage hazard of soybeans harvested with black nightshades. Phytopathology (Abstracts) 71:884.Google Scholar
3. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1983. Influence of planting date on the growth of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 31:180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Roberts, H. A. and Lockett, P. M. 1978. Seed dormancy and field emergence in Solanum nigrum L. Weed Res. 18:231–241.Google Scholar
6. Rogers, B. S. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1981. Biology of weeds of the Solanum nigrum complex (Solanum section Solanum) in North America. U.S. Dep. of Agric., Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Reviews and Manuals ARM-W-23. 30 pp.Google Scholar
7. Schilling, E. E. 1981. Systematics of Solanum section Solanum in North America. Syst. Bot. 6:172–185.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, R. G. Jr., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in fieldbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar