Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:49:12.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Soil pH on Degradation, Movement, and Plant Uptake of Chlorsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Fredrickson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Patrick J. Shea
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

The influence of soil pH on the uptake, degradation, and movement of chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} in soil was examined. Phytotoxicity decreased as pH increased in a silty clay loam with an adjusted pH range of 5.9 to 7.5. Fresh weights of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Funks G-499 GBR’] shoots grown in soil at pH 7.5 and containing 0.8 or 1.6 ppbw chlorsulfuron were not different from the controls while large differences occurred at pH 5.9. Uptake of 14C-chlorsulfuron by wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Centurk’) in a silty clay loam with a pH of 5.9 was 67 to 100% greater than at pH 7.5. Soil pH strongly influenced the degradation rate of chlorsulfuron in a laboratory incubation study. Chlorsulfuron half-life in a silty clay loam was 1.9 weeks at pH 5.6 and 10 weeks at pH 7.5. Soil thin-layer chromatography indicated a high leaching potential for chlorsulfuron, and mobility increased as soil pH was increased.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Briggs, G. G., Bromilow, R. H., and Evans, A. A. 1982. Relationships between lipophilicity and root uptake and translocation of nonionized chemicals by barley. Pestic. Sci. 13:497504.Google Scholar
2. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1980. Studies on the persistence of DPX 4189. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:31.Google Scholar
3. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1984. Basis for response differences of two broadleaf weeds to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 32: 162167.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, K. D., Beitler, J. S., Finnerty, D. W., Henson, M. A., Rupp, R. N., and Stone, J. R. 1983. Progress of crop rotation studies following the use of chlorsulfuron in cereals and reduced tillage fallow in the United States and Canada. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Proc. 38:35.Google Scholar
5. Palm, H. L., Riggleman, J. D., and Allison, D. A. 1980. Worldwide review of the new cereal herbicide – DPX 4189. Proc. 1980 Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 2:16.Google Scholar
6. Peterson, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1983. Effect of soil type on chlorsulfuron carryover in eastern South Dakota. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Proc. 38:35.Google Scholar
7. Slates, R. V. 1983. Determination of chlorsulfuron residues in grain, straw, and green plants of cereals by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:113117.Google Scholar
8. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar
9. Walker, A. and Brown, P. A. 1982. Crop responses to low doses of pendimethalin, napropamide, metolachlor and chlorsulfuron in the soil. Proc. 1982 Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 2:141147.Google Scholar
10. Walker, A. and Brown, P. A. 1983. Measurement and prediction of chlorsulfuron persistence in soil. Bull. Environ. Toxicol. 30: 365372.Google Scholar
11. Ulrich, T. S. and Miller, S. D. 1983. Soil persistence of chlorsulfuron in North Dakota. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Proc. 38:44.Google Scholar
12. Zahnow, E. W. 1982. Analysis of the herbicide chlorsulfuron in soil by liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30: 854.Google Scholar