Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:25:06.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Paraquat on Dark-Grown Phaseolus vulgaris Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hagit Zer ,
Mordechai Chevion  and
Israel Goldberg
Hagit Zer
Affiliation:
Dep. Cellular Biochem., Hebrew Univ.-Hadassah Med. School, Jerusalem 91010 Israel
Mordechai Chevion
Affiliation:
Dep. Cellular Biochem., Hebrew Univ.-Hadassah Med. School, Jerusalem 91010 Israel
Israel Goldberg
Affiliation:
Dep. Applied Microbiol., Hebrew Univ.-Hadassah Med. School, Jerusalem 91010 Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paraquat is known to affect all green plants and other eukaryotic organisms including mammalian cells. The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of paraquat toxicity in nonphotosynthetic plant cells using dark-grown kidney bean cells in tissue culture. It is shown that uptake of paraquat is an active process, and that paraquat inhibits cell growth, reduces DNA synthesis, and inhibits the activity of hydroxypyruvate reductase while enhancing the activity of glutathione reductase which is involved in cellular defense against oxidant stress. Additionally, it is demonstrated that iron ions are involved in paraquat toxicity. We conclude that uptake of paraquat into cells is via polyamine channels and that the deleterious effects of paraquat on these nonphotosynthetic cells are mediated by iron.

Keywords

Paraquat, 1,1’ dimethyl-4,4’ bipyridinium ion, kidney bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘BRTIL WAX’)Free radicalssperminepolyaminesiron
Type
Physiology, Chemistry and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 528 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Altman, A. 1982. Retardation of radish leaf senescence by polyamines. Physiol. of the Plant 54:189–193.Google Scholar
2. Apelbaum, A., Burgoon, A. C., Anderson, J. D., and Lieberman, M. 1981. Polyamines inhibit biosynthesis of ethylene in higher plant tissue and fruit protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 68:453–456.Google Scholar
3. Balin, A. K., Goodman, D.B.P., Rasmussen, H., and Cristofalo, Y. J. 1978. Oxygen sensitive stages of the cell cycle of human diploid cells. J. Cell Biol. 78:390–400.Google Scholar
4. Bell, S. L., Schwarz, O. J., and Hughes, K. W. 1976. Studies of the herbicide paraquat. I. Effect on the cell cycle and DNA synthesis in Vicia faba . Can. J. Genet. and Cytol. 18:93–99.Google Scholar
5. Ben-Arie, R., Lurie, S., and Mattoo, A. K. 1982. Temperature-dependent inhibitory effects of calcium and spermine on ethylene biosynthesis in apple discs correlate with changes in microsomal membrane microviscosity. Plant Sci. Lett. 24:239–247.Google Scholar
6. Bus, J. S., Aust, S. D., and Gibson, J. E. 1974. Superoxide and singlet oxygen catalyzed lipid peroxidation as a possible mechanism for PQ (methyl-viologen) toxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58. 749–755.Google Scholar
7. Campbell, R. A., Bartos, D., Morris, D. R., Daves, G. D. Jr., and Bortos, F. 1978. Advances in Polyamine Research. Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Carmines, E. L., Carchman, R. A., and Borzelleca, J. F. 1981. Investigations into the mechanism of paraquat toxicity utilizing a cell culture system. Toxicol, and Appl. Pharmacol. 58:353–362.Google Scholar
9. Chia, L. S., McRae, D. G., and Thompson, J. E. 1982. Light dependence of paraquat initiated membrane deterioration in bean plants. Evidence for the involvement of superoxide. Physiology of the Plant 56:492–499.Google Scholar
10. Foyer, C. H. and Halliwell, B. 1976. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta 133:21–25.Google Scholar
11. Halliwell, B. 1981. The light reaction of photosynthesis. Pages 31–65 in Halliwell, B., ed. Chloroplast Metabolism. The Structure and Function of Chloroplasts in Green Cells. Claredon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
12. Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J.M.C. 1984. Oxygen toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition metals and disease. Biochem. J. 219:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Kelner, M. J. and Bagnell, R. 1989. Paraquat resistance associated with reduced NADPH reductase in an energy-dependent accumulating cell line. Arch. Biochem. and Biophys. 274:366–374.Google Scholar
14. Kohen, R. and Chevion, M. 1985. Paraquat toxicity is enhanced by iron and reduced by desferrioxamine in laboratory mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 34:1841–1843.Google Scholar
15. Kopaczyk-Locke, K. 1977. In vitro and in vivo effects of paraquat on rat liver mitochondria. Pages 93–115 in A. Autor, P., ed. Biochemical Mechanisms of Paraquat Toxicity. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Korbashi, P., Kohen, R., Katzhendler, J., and Chevion, M. 1986. Iron-mediated paraquat toxicity in Escherichia coli . J. Biol. Chem. 261:12472–12476.Google Scholar
17. Lewinsohn, E. and Gressel, J. 1984. Benzyl viologen-mediated counteraction of diquat and paraquat phytotoxicities. Plant Physiol. 76:125–130.Google Scholar
18. Lin, Y-J. and Schanker, L. S. 1981. Active transport of foreign amino acids by rat lung slices. Biochem. Pharmacol. 30:2937–2943.Google Scholar
19. Masek, L. and Richards, R. J. 1990. Interaction between paraquat, endogenous lung amines, antioxidants and isolated mouse clara cells. Toxicology 63:315–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Merkle, M. G., Leinweber, C. L., and Bovey, R. W. 1965. The influence of light, oxygen and temperature on the herbicidal properties of paraquat. Plant Physiol. 40:832–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Minakami, H., Kitzler, J. W., and Fridovich, I. 1990. Effects of pH, glucose and chelating agents on lethality of paraquat to Escherichia coli . J. Bacteriol. 172:691–695.Google Scholar
22. Minton, K. W., Tabor, H., and White-Tabor, C. 1990. Paraquat toxicity is increased in Escherichia coli defective in the synthesis of polyamines. PNAS, USA 87:2851–2855.Google Scholar
23. Misra, H. P. and Gorsky, L. D. 1981. Paraquat and NADPH-dependent lipid peroxidation in lung microsomes. J. Biol. Chem. 256:9994–9998.Google Scholar
24. Ning-Sun, Y. J. and Scanalios, G. 1975. De novo synthesis and development control of multiple gene controlled malate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in Maize scutella . Biochim. Biophys. Acta 384:293–306.Google Scholar
25. Pegg, A. E. 1986. Recent advances in the biochemistry of polyamines in eukaryotes. Biochem. J. 234:249–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Rabinowitch, H. D. and Fridovich, I. 1983. Superoxide radicals, superoxide dismutases and oxygen toxicity in plants. Photochem. and Photobiol. 37:679–690.Google Scholar
27. Schenk, R. V. and Hilderbrandt, A. C. 1972. Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can. J. Bot. 50:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Smith, L. L. 1982. The identification of an accumulation system for diamines and polyamines into the lung and its relevance to paraquat toxicity. Arch. Toxicol. (Suppl.) 5:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Smith, L. L. and Wyatt, I. 1981. The accumulation of putrescine into slices of rat lung and brain and its relationship to the accumulation of paraquat. Biochem. Pharmacol. 30:1053–1058.Google Scholar
30. Smith, T. A. 1985. Polyamines. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36:117–143.Google Scholar
31. Tolbert, N. E., Yamazaki, R. E., and Oeser, A. 1970. Localization and properties of hydroxypyruvate and glyoxylate reductases in spinach leaf particles. J. Biol. Chem. 245:5129–5136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Van Asbeck, B. S., Hillen, F. C., Boonen, H.C.M., de Jong, J., Dormans, J.A.M.A., van der Wal, N.A.A., Marx, J.J.M., and Sanger, B. 1989. Continuous intravenous infusion of desferoxamine reduced mortality by paraquat in vitamin E-deficient rats. Annu. Rev. Resp. Dis. 139:769–773.Google Scholar