Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:26:32.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Moisture Stress on Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas C. Lauridson ,
Robert G. Wilson  and
Lloyd C. Haderlie
Thomas C. Lauridson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Lloyd C. Haderlie
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil & Plant Sci., Univ. of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effect of moisture stress on the absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), and glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] within the Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRAR] plants. The absorption and translocation of picloram and dicamba were unaffected by moisture stress. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate to the roots and apical meristem of Canada thistle was reduced by increasing moisture stress. Weekly differential irrigation of Canada thistle field plots during the summers of 1980 and 1981 established three soil moisture regimes averaging −6.6, −11.3, and −15.0 bars at the time of herbicide treatment. When Canada thistle control was evaluated 1 year after application of glyphosate, dicamba, and picloram at 2.5, 1.1, and 0.6 kg/ha, respectively, no differences in Canada thistle shoot control were found between moisture stress treatments.

Keywords

AbsorptiontranslocationdicambaglyphosatepicloramCIRAR
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 1983 , pp. 674 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28:277–282.Google Scholar
2. Bielorai, H., and Hopmans, P. A.M. 1975. Recovery of leaf water potential, transpiration, and photosynthesis of cotton during irrigation cycles. Agron. J. 67:629–632.Google Scholar
3. Chang, F. Y. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1968. Translocation of dicamba in Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 16:176–181.Google Scholar
4. Cox, L. M. and Boersma, L. 1967. Transpiration as a function of soil temperature and soil water stress. Plant Physiol. 42:550–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Davis, F. S., Merkle, M. G., and Bovey, R. W. 1968. Effect of moisture stress on the absorption and transport of herbicides in woody plants. Bot. Gaz. 129:183–189.Google Scholar
6. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:534–539.Google Scholar
7. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., and Behrens, R. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2,4,5-T in killing mesquite. Weeds 4:139–147.Google Scholar
8. Furrer, J. D., Martin, A. R., Roeth, F. W., Moomaw, R. S., Wilson, R. G., and Wicks, G. A. 1981. Herbicide use guide in Nebraska. Nebraska Coop. Ext. Ser. E.C. 82-130. 28.Google Scholar
9. Hamdoun, A. M. 1972. Regenerative capacity of root fragments of [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] Weed Res. 12:128–136.Google Scholar
10. Hodgson, J. M. 1968. The nature, ecology, and control of Canada thistle. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 1381, 32.Google Scholar
11. Hotzman, F. W. and Behrens, R. 1979. Response of water stressed weeds to 2,4-D and dicamba. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34:11–12.Google Scholar
12. Merkle, M. G. and Davis, F. S. 1967. The effect of moisture stress on the absorption and movement of 2,4,5-T and picloram in beans. Weeds. 15:10–12.Google Scholar
13. McPherson, H. G. and Boyer, J. S. 1977. Regulation of grain yield by photosynthesis in maize subjected to a water deficiency. Agron. J. 69:714–718.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to Johnsongrass and soybeans. Weed Sci. 26:605–608.Google Scholar
15. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.]. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033–1048.Google Scholar
16. Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195–200.Google Scholar
17. Sionit, N. and Kramer, P. J. 1976. Water potential and stomatal resistance of sunflower and soybean subjected to water stress during various growth stages. Plant Physiol. 58:537–540.Google Scholar
18. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.Google Scholar
19. Sung, F. M. and Kreig, D. R. 1979. Relative sensibility of photosynthate assimilation and translocation of 14C to water stress. Plant Physiol. 64:852–856.Google Scholar
20. Tennant, D. 1975. A test of modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63:995–1001.Google Scholar
21. Wardlaw, I. F. 1969. Effect of water stress on translocation in relation to photosynthesis and growth of (Lolium temulentum L.) Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 27:1–16.Google Scholar