Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:26:02.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of MCPA on 14C-Diclofop Uptake and Translocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Wayne Olson  and
J. D. Nalewaja
J. D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of the dimethylamine salt of MCPA {[(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy] acetic acid} pretreatment, darkness from 1 day prior to treatment until harvest, and exogenous sucrose on diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxyl] propanoic acid} glucose, and sucrose uptake and translocation by wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Uptake of 14C-diclofop label by wild oat foliage was not influenced by MCPA pretreatment, constant dark treatment, or the addition of exogenous sucrose. Total 14C-diclofop and 14C-glucose label uptake and translocation were similar whether 5 cm of the treated leaf tip were placed in distilled water or 1% (w/v) sucrose. Downward translocation of 14C-diclofop, 14C-sucrose, and 14C-glucose label in the phloem of wild oat was reduced similarly by MCPA, constant dark treatments, or a combination of the two. Upward translocation of 14C-diclofop label was greater and exudation of 14C-diclofop label into the ‘tip’ solution was less than that of 14C-sucrose or 14C-glucose label, regardless of MCPA or constant dark treatments. Downward translocation of 14C-diclofop label was reduced as much by MCPA topically applied to the wild oat leaf 1 cm above, 1 cm below, or with the diclofop as with the MCPA broadcast pretreatment.

Keywords

Antagonismherbicide interactions
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L. J. 1976. Effects on solute transport and plant constituents. Pages 220–250 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, R., Elakkad, M., and Smith, L. J. 1974. Wild oat control in wheat and barley. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:73–75.Google Scholar
3. Behrens, R., Elakkad, M., and Smith, L. J. 1975. Wild oat control in wheat and barley. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:89–94.Google Scholar
4. Brezeanu, A. G., Davis, D. G., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1976. Ultra-structural effects and translocation of methyl-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoate in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oat (Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 54:2038–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. California Agric. Exp. Stn. and Ext. Serv. Manual 35. p. 135.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G. and Jansen, G. E. 1975. Annual weed control in canning peas. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:51–54.Google Scholar
7. Leonard, O. A., Glenn, R. K., and Bayer, D. E. 1965. Studies on the cut-surface method. I. Translocation in blue oak and madrone. Weeds 13:346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mayland, P. G., Palm, E. T., and Marrese, R. J. 1975. HOE-23408, an annual grass herbicide for use in small grains and non-crops. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:102.Google Scholar
9. Mulder, C.E.G., Miller, S. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1976. Wild oat control with HOE-23408 plus broadleaf herbicides. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:136.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D., Adamczewski, K. A., Garcia-Torres, L., Pacholak, E., and Miller, S. D. 1976. Factors affecting HOE-23408 phytotoxicity. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:132–134.Google Scholar
11. Oliverio, V. T., Denham, C., and Davidson, J. B. 1962. Oxygen flask combustion in determination of C14 and H3 in biological materials. Anal. Biochem. 4:188–189.Google Scholar
12. Qureshi, F. A. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1979. Interaction of diclofop-methyl and MCPA on wild oats (Avena fatua . Weed Sci. 27:202–205.Google Scholar
13. Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Effect of lanolin or lanolin + starch rings on absorption and translocation of 2,4-D or glyphosate in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum . Weed Sci. 28:149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shimabukuro, M. A., Shimabukuro, R. H., Nord, W. S., and Hoerauf, R. S. 1978. Physiology effects of methyl 2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoate on oat, wild oat, and wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 8:199–207.Google Scholar
15. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1977. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and wheat. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. No. 193.Google Scholar
16. Strand, O. E. and Smith, L. J. 1975. Weed control in spring wheat at Crookston, Minnesota in 1975. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:83.Google Scholar
17. Strand, O. E. and Smith, L. J. 1976. Wild oat control in spring wheat at Stephen, Minnesota. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:122–123.Google Scholar
18. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. Basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity in wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Weed Sci. 28:371–377.Google Scholar