Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:52.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of light environment during tillage on the recruitment of various summer annuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert S. Gallagher  and
John Cardina
John Cardina
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed seeds can require an exposure to light for induction of germination. Conducting tillage operations at night and thus preventing the photoinduction of germination has been proposed as a means to reduce weed emergence in agricultural systems. This research was conducted to evaluate night tillage as a weed management option and to determine which tillage operations have the greatest effect on light-mediated recruitment. Weed emergence was evaluated after conducting factorial combinations of day and night moldboard plowing and disking in the springtime from 1992 through 1995. The light environment during disking generally had a slightly greater effect on emergence than the light environment during plowing. Emergence of pigweed species and giant foxtail was, at most, 30 to 55% higher following day vs. night disking. Emergence of other weeds was not affected by the light environment during tillage. We conclude that night tillage may not be a viable approach to weed management due to insufficient reductions in weed emergence associated with night tillage and the high degree of variability in the recruitment response to light conditions during tillage.

Keywords

Giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFAcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. POROLredroot pigweed, Amarantbus retrofexus L. AMAREsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACHcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBELTillageweed controlphytochromelightgerminationrecruitmentSETFACHEALPOROLAMAREAMACHAMBEL
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 214 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1977. Role of temperature in the germination ecology of three annual summer weeds. Oecologia 30: 377–382.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1980. Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia . Ecology 61: 475–480.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, H. J. and Karssen, C. M. 1993. Seasonal periodicity in germination of seeds of Chenopodium album L. Ann. Bot. 72: 462–473.Google Scholar
Cone, J. W. and Kendrick, R. E. 1986. Photocontrol of seed germination. Pages 443–462 in Kendrick, R. and Kronberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff/W. D. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998a. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination I: effect of seed burial and germination temperature. Weed Sci. 46: 48–52.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998b. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination II: development of very low fluence sensitivity. Weed Sci. 46: 53–58.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. M. and Nezedal, W. 1990. Photocontrol of weeds without herbicides. Naturwissenschaften 77: 158–163.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, A. L. 1994. The physiology of phytochrome action. Pages 211–269 in Kendrick, R. and Kronenberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. and Struik, G. 1964. A possible ecological relation between soil disturbance, light flash, and seed germination. Ecology 45: 884–886.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Bailaré, C. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1994. Photostimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126: 145–152.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Bailaré, C. L., and Sánchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations. Plant Cell Environ. 14: 501–508.Google Scholar
Smith, H. 1995. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 289–315.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J. H., and Dickey, D. A. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 183–188.Google Scholar
Wesson, G. and Wareing, P. F. 1969. The role of light in the germination of naturally occurring populations of buried weed seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 20: 402–413.Google Scholar