Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:08:47.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Preplant Herbicide Applications for No-Till Soybean (Glycine max) Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. N. Stougaard ,
George Kapusta  and
Gordon Roskamp
R. N. Stougaard
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Gordon Roskamp
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agric., Western Illinois Univ., Macomb, IL 61455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several field studies were conducted during 1981 and 1982 to determine whether early preplant (EPP) applications of residual herbicides would prevent the establishment of vegetation before planting no-till soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams’]. Early preplant applications of either cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazin-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropionitrile} or cyanazine plus oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide) were applied in the fall and 3, 2, and 1 month(s) before planting no-till soybeans. In all studies, the treatments prevented vegetation from becoming established before planting, and season-long weed control was achieved with several different treatments. Early preplant cyanazine plus oryzalin provided greater than 90% control for the entire season where grass densities were low. Where grass densities were high (greater than 90% ground cover), EPP cyanazine plus a preemergence application of metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] plus metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] or a postemergence application of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino) butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} controlled 90% of the weeds, which was equal to or better than the standard preemergence treatments used (80 to 98% weed control).

Keywords

Cyanazinefluazifop-butyloryzalinsethoxydim
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 293 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P. 1983. Dinitroaniline herbicides. Pages 243–247 in Anderson, W. P., 2nd ed. Weed Science Principles. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
2. Connell, J. T. and Derting, C. W. 1973. Glyphosate performance on johnsongrass and associated weed species in no-till soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:51–58.Google Scholar
3. Erbach, D. C., Wilkins, D. E., and Lovely, W. G. 1969. An evaluation of chemical and mechanical weed control for soybeans grown with no-plow tillage systems. Proc. North Cent Weed Control Conf. 24:74–75.Google Scholar
4. Kapusta, George and Strieker, C. F. 1976. Herbicide weed control in stubble no-till planted corn. Weed Sci. 24:605–610.Google Scholar
5. Kapusta, George. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520–526.Google Scholar
6. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
7. Rathmann, D. P. and Miller, S. D. 1981. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:410–414.Google Scholar
8. Staniforth, David D. and Lovely, Walter G. 1975. Weed control systems for no-till soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:60.Google Scholar