Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:34:24.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of Arsenic in Soil Profiles after Repeated Applications of MSMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. E. Hiltbold ,
B. F. Hajek  and
G. A. Buchanan
A. E. Hiltbold
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agron. & Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL. 36830
B. F. Hajek
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agron. & Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL. 36830
G. A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agron. & Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL. 36830
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arsenic as MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate) was applied to three soil types over a 6-year period. Percentage recovery of applied arsenic averaged 67, 57, and 39% in Hart-sells fine sandy loam, Decatur silt loam, and Dothan loamy sand soils, respectively. Essentially all of the arsenic recovered in the soils occurred in the plow layer with no evidence of leaching into deeper zones. Batch-equilibrium and soil-column studies in the laboratory indicated that the rate of MSMA movement through the surface horizon would be fastest in Dothan loamy sand and slowest in Decatur silt loam.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 272 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Journal. 1963. Vol. 46:141–143.Google Scholar
2. Bird, M.L., Challenger, F., Charlton, P.T., and Smith, J.O. 1948. Studies on biological methylation. 11. Action of moulds on inorganic and organic compounds of arsenic Biochem. J. 43:78–83.Google Scholar
3. Challenger, F. 1947. Biological methylation. Sci. Progress 35:396–416.Google Scholar
4. Dickens, Ray and Hiltbold, A.E. 1967. Movement and persistence of methanearsonates in soil. Weeds 15:299–304.Google Scholar
5. Ehman, P.J. 1965. Effect of arsenical buildup in the soil on subsequent growth and residue content of crops. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 18:685–687.Google Scholar
6. Hajek, B.F. 1969. Chemical interactions of wastewater in a soil environment. J. Water Poll. Control Fed. 41:1775–1786.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, L.R. and Hiltbold, A.E. 1969. Arsenic content of soil and crops following use of methanearsonate herbicides. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 33:279–282.Google Scholar
8. Neiswander, C.R. 1951. Duration of the effectiveness of lead arsenate applied to turf for white grub control. J. Econ. Entomol. 44:221–224.Google Scholar
9. Tammes, P.M. and deLint, M.M. 1969. Leaching of arsenic from son. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 17:128–132.Google Scholar
10. Thorn, C. and Raper, K.B. 1932. The arsenic fungi of Gosio. Science 76:548–550.Google Scholar
11. Von Endt, D.W., Kearney, P.C., and Kaufman, D.D. 1968. Degradation of monosodium methanearsonic acid by soil microorganisms. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:17–20.Google Scholar
12. Woolson, E.A. and Kearney, P.C. 1973. Persistence and reactions of 14C-cacodylic acid in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7:47–50.Google Scholar