Article contents
Disappearance of Triallate from Field Soils
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2017
Abstract
Small field plots, 18 by 18 cm in size, were treated with S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiolcarbamate (triallate) at rates equivalent to 2.8 kg/ha at five sites in Saskatchewan. After one growing season (5 months) the residues remaining in the 0 to 5 and 5 to 10-cm levels of soil were determined by gas chromatographic analysis. At all locations 16 to 27% of the applied herbicide was found in the top 5 cm while negligible residues were detected at the 5 to 10-cm level.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Weed Science Society of America
References
Literature Cited
1.
Banting, J. D.
1967. Factors affecting the activity of di-allate and triallate. Weed Res.
7:302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Day, P. R.
1956. Report of the committee on physical analyses, 1954–5, Soil Science Society of America. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc.
20:167–169.Google Scholar
3.
Fryer, J. D. and Kirkland, K.
1970. Field experiments to investigate long-term effects of repeated applications of MCPA, triallate, simazine and linuron: Report after 6 years. Weed Res.
10:133–158.Google Scholar
4.
Smith, A. E.
1969. Factors affecting the loss of triallate from soils. Weed Res.
9:306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.
Smith, A. E.
1970. Degradation, adsorption and volatility of di-allate and triallate in prairie soils. Weed Res.
10:331–339.Google Scholar
6.
Walkley, A.
1947. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils-affects of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci.
63:251–264.Google Scholar
- 15
- Cited by