Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:27:18.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars to Metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Runyan ,
W. K. McNeil  and
T. F. Peeper
T. J. Runyan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
W. K. McNeil
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
T. F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Of 15 hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown on several soil types and treated in the spring with several rates of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)-one], ‘Lindon’ and ‘Vona’ were the most sensitive and ‘TAM W 101’ and ‘Osage’ the most tolerant. Differences in cultivar response to metribuzin occurred in 9 of 13 locations, but were not observed when precipitation was very light or when the soil was saturated at the time of treatment. TAM W 101 was also more tolerant than Vona in the greenhouse.

Keywords

Bromus sp.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 94 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carter, H. W., Norton, H. W., and Dungan, G. H. 1957. Wheat and cheat. Agron. J. 49:261–267.Google Scholar
2. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1957. Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 611 pp.Google Scholar
3. Featherly, H. I. 1946. Manual of the grasses of Oklahoma. Oklhoma Agricultural and Mechanical College Bulletin 43(21): 80.Google Scholar
4. Graf, G. T. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1976. Differential response of potato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:137–139.Google Scholar
5. Hardcastle, W. S. 1974. Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybeans. Weed Res. 14:181–184.Google Scholar
6. Hoffman, D. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1978. Plant competition for atrazine. Weed Sci. 26:94–99.Google Scholar
7. Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max.) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27:267–269.Google Scholar
8. Peeper, T. F. 1977. Winter annual grass weed problems in Oklahoma wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:92.Google Scholar
9. Runyan, T. J. and Peeper, T. F. 1978. Cultural control of Bromus sp. in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:68.Google Scholar
10. Stephenson, G. R., McLeod, J. E., and Phatak, S. C. 1976. Differential tolerance of tomato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:161–165.Google Scholar
11. Welsh, J. R., Ellis, G., Normann, R., Ball, W. S., Hinze, G., and Mann, H. 1978. Registration of Vona wheat. Crop Sci. 18:695.Google Scholar