Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:47:17.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degradation of Chlorsulfuron by Soil Microorganisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Madan M. Joshi
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod., and Central Res. and Development Dep., Exp. Stn., E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, DE 19898
Hugh M. Brown
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod., and Central Res. and Development Dep., Exp. Stn., E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, DE 19898
James A. Romesser
Affiliation:
Agric. Prod., and Central Res. and Development Dep., Exp. Stn., E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, DE 19898

Abstract

Degradation of chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} in acidic and alkaline soils was evaluated using plant bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) radiotracer techniques. Soil sterilization with either ethylene oxide (Et0) or gamma irradiation significantly reduced breakdown of chlorsulfuron; the ability for degradation was restored by reinoculation with indigenous soil microorganisms. Streptomyces griseolus (a soil actinomycete), Aspergillus niger, and Penicillium sp. (soil fungi) were demonstrated to degrade 14C-chlorsulfuron in pure culture. In addition to microbial breakdown, chemical hydrolysis was an important factor in the disappearance of chlorsulfuron from soil. The contribution of chemical hydrolysis to total degradation was a function of soil pH, with hydrolysis occurring most rapidly in acidic soils. Both dissipation processes slowed markedly at low temperatures.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Fletcher, C. L. and Kaufman, D. D., 1980. Effect of sterilization methods on 3-chloroaniline behavior in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:667671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Levitt, G., Ploeg, H. L., Weigel, R. C. Jr., and Fitzgerald, D. J. 1981. 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl) amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:416424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Palm, H. L., Riggleman, J. D., and Allison, D. A. 1980. Worldwide review of the new cereal herbicide – DPX-4189. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds 1:16.Google Scholar
4. Ray, T. B. 1984. The site of action of chlorsulfuron: inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75: 827831.Google Scholar
5. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar
6. Walker, A. and Brown, P. A. 1983. Measurement and prediction of chlorsulfuron persistence in soil. Bull. Environ. Toxicol. 30: 365372.Google Scholar