Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:59:51.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Degradation and Bioactivity of Metolachlor in the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael P. Braverman ,
Terry L. Lavy  and
Clyde J. Barnes
Michael P. Braverman
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Terry L. Lavy
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Clyde J. Barnes
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In bioassays, rice (Oryza sativa L.) recovery from metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] injury tended to be slower in flooded rice, but was not significantly different from the recovery rate in a nonflooded rice. In soils treated with 1 ppm (w/w) metolachlor and incubated in constant-temperature chambers, the half-life of metolachlor was shorter at 40 C than at 30 C. The degradation rate of metolachlor was not significantly correlated with declining moisture potentials in the range of −30 to −80 kPa. The CO2 evolution from metolachlor-treated soil was negatively correlated with incubation time and positively correlated to declining moisture levels. In a field study, metolachlor, as determined by bioassay, was mobile in a Taloka silt loam soil profile. After being incorporated to 7.5 cm, it became evenly distributed in the top 15 cm of the soil profile within 18 days. Metolachlor adsorption was positively correlated with clay and organic carbon content.

Keywords

Bioassayriceleachingmicrobial activity
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouchard, D. C., Lavy, T. L., and Marx, D. B. 1982. Fate of metribuzin, metolachlor, and fluometuron in soil. Weed Sci. 30:629–632.Google Scholar
2. Braverman, M. P. and Lavy, T. L. 1982. The effects of metolachlor residues on rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:340.Google Scholar
3. Dao, T. H., Marx, D. B., Lavy, T. L., and Dragun, J. 1982. Effect and statistical evaluation of soil sterilization on aniline and diuron adsorption isotherms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:963–969.Google Scholar
4. Edwards, W. T. 1982. A timesaving technique for measuring respiration rates in incubated soil samples. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:1114–1116.Google Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K. 1983. Effects of CGA-43089 on responses of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to metolachlor combined with ozone or antioxidants. Weed Sci. 31:280–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McGahen, L. L. and Tiedje, J. M. 1978. Metabolism of two new acylaniline herbicides, Antor herbicide (H-22234) and Dual (metolachlor) by the soil fungi Chaetomium globosussa . J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:414–419.Google Scholar
7. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:46–52.Google Scholar
8. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity, and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Went, F. W. 1942. Growth, auxin and tropisms in decapitated avena coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 17:236–249.Google Scholar
10. Zimdahl, R. L. and Clark, S. K. 1982. Degradation of three acetanilide herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 30:545–548.Google Scholar