Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:16:39.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop Rotation and Herbicide Effects on the Population Dynamics of Two Annual Grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. Carroll Johnson III  and
Harold D. Coble
W. Carroll Johnson III
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7626
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7626
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 3-yr study was initiated in 1982 to determine the effects of herbicides and crop rotations on large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA] and broadleaf signalgrass [Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash # BRAPP] population dynamics. Regardless of the crop rotation sequence, broadleaf signalgrass immediately became the predominant weed where standard herbicide programs were used. Large crabgrass became the predominant species after two growing seasons if no herbicides were applied. Domination by large crabgrass appeared to be due to greater seed production. The domination by broadleaf signalgrass in plots treated with herbicides was attributed to its tolerance to the primary grass herbicide alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-methoxymethyl)acetamide]. Broadleaf signalgrass emergence from soil treated with 2.2 kg ai/ha was not statistically different from that in untreated soil, while large crabgrass and fall panicum [Panicum dichotomiflorum (L.) Michx. # PANDI] emergence was significantly reduced at the same rate.

Keywords

AlachlorBrachiaria platyphyllaDigitaria sanguinalisPanicum dichotomiflorumDIGSABRAPPPANDI
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 452 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bachthaler, G. 1967. Changes in arable weed infestation with modern crop husbandry techniques. Abstr. 6th Int. Congr. Plant Prot. Vienna. Pages 167–168.Google Scholar
2. Brenchley, W. E. and Warington, K. 1933. The weed seed population of arable soil. II. Influence of crop, soil, and methods of cultivation upon the relative abundance of viable seeds. J. Ecol. 21:103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds. I. Longevity, periodicity of germination, and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Sci. Agric. 26:307–346.Google Scholar
4. Conn, J. S. and Delapp, J. A. 1983. Weed species shifts with increasing field age in Alaska. Weed Sci. 31:520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Davis, B. T. 1968. Selective activity against weeds of herbicides used in vineyards. Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 785–790.Google Scholar
6. Elmore, C. D. 1981. Ecological basis for predicting shifts in weed populations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:259.Google Scholar
7. Fryer, J. D. and Chancellor, R. J. 1970. Evidence of changing weed populations in arable land. Proc. 10th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 958–964.Google Scholar
8. Fryer, J. D. and Chancellor, R. J. 1970. Herbicides and our changing weeds. Pages 105–118 in Perring, F., ed. The Flora of a Changing Britain. The Botanical Society of the British Isles, Chasery, Hamilton.Google Scholar
9. Gallaher, R. N. 1979. Weeds after four years of double cropping. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:132–136.Google Scholar
10. Hammerton, J. L. 1968. Past and future changes in weed species and weed floras. Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 1136–1146.Google Scholar
11. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evaluation of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. 3rd Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 179–188.Google Scholar
12. Harper, J. L. 1957. Ecological aspects of weed control. Outlook Agric. 1:197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hay, J. R. 1968. The changing weed problem on the prairies. Agric. Inst. Rev. 23:17–19.Google Scholar
14. Houghton, J. M. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Environmental factors that affect the development and control of Panicum species. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 24:82.Google Scholar
15. Koch, W. 1964. Some observations on changes in weed populations under continuous cereal cropping and with different methods of weed control. Weed Res. 4:351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Roberts, H. A. 1962. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. II. Effects of six years of cropping on the weed seeds in the soil. J. Ecol. 50:803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Roberts, H. A. 1969. Viable weed seeds in cultivated soils. Rep. Nat. Veg. Res. Stn. for 1969, Wellsbourne, U.K. Pages 25–38.Google Scholar
18. Roberts, H. A. and Dawkins, P. A. 1967. Effect of cultivation on the numbers of viable weed seeds in soil. Weed Res. 7:290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1973. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and undisturbed soils. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Roberts, H. A. and Stokes, F. G. 1966. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. VI. Seed populations of soil under commercial cropping. J. Appl. Ecol. 3:181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sagar, G. R. 1974. On the ecology of weed control. Pages 42–56 in Jones, D. P. and Solomon, M. E., eds. Biology in Pest and Disease Control. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
22. Skroch, W. A. 1970. Weed population shifts in apple orchards. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:217.Google Scholar
23. Thompson, L. Jr., Houghton, J. M., Slife, F. W., and Butler, H. S. 1971. Metabolism of atrazine by fall panicum and large crabgrass. Weed Sci. 19:409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Tompkins, D. J. and Grant, W. F. 1977. Effects of herbicides on species diversity of two plant communities. Ecology 58: 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Warnes, D. D. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Decline of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) seeds in soil under various cultural and chemical practices. Weed Sci. 32:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar