Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:08:45.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Spurred Anoda in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Francisco Solano ,
J. W. Schrader  and
H. D. Coble
Francisco Solano
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh 27607
J. W. Schrader
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh 27607
H. D. Coble
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh 27607
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Control of spurred anoda [Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht.] in the greenhouse was less than 75% after 28 days with preplant incorporated herbicides except dinitramine [N4,N4-diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine] which gave 88 to 94% control. In greenhouse and field studies with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Coker 210′) preemergence applications of norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinone] controlled 93 to 100% of the spurred anoda 4 weeks after application. Control with postemergence applications of fluometuron [1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-toly)urea] was 46.0 to 92.5%; 90.7 to 100% with prometryn [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio-s-triazine]; and 100% with methazole, [2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5-dione]. Preemergence applications of norflurazon plus fluometuron, prometryn, or methazole applied postemergence controlled 93, 97, and 100% of spurred anoda, respectively. Fluometuron plus the same three postemergence treatments controlled 63, 95, and 88% of spurred anoda, respectively. Results of our tests suggest that the best control of spurred anoda can be obtained in cotton by a combination of norflurazon applied preemergence at 1.68 kg/ha followed by two postemergence applications of either fluometuron at a rate of 2.24 kg/ha, prometryn at a rate of 1.68 kg/ha, or methazole at a rate of 1.68 kg/ha.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , November 1976 , pp. 553 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, R.S. and Ivy, H.W. 1973. Preemergence control of spurred anoda and prickly sida in cotton. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:134.Google Scholar
2. Baker, R.S. and Ivy, H.W. 1974. Control of spurred anoda in cotton. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:119.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G.A. 1974. Weeds plague cotton growers from the Carolinas to California. Weeds Today 5(1):7.Google Scholar
4. Chandler, J.M. 1975. Comparative response of selected malvaceae and convolvulaceae species to herbicide. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:112.Google Scholar
5. Lambert, W.M. and Oliver, L.R. 1975. Control of spurred anoda in cotton and soybeans. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:122.Google Scholar
6. Rutz, G. 1974. Spurred anoda: Will it be a major cotton pest? Southeast Farm Press 1(48):7.Google Scholar
7. Solano, F., Schrader, J.W., and Coble, H.D. 1975. Growth and development of spurred anoda. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstract 154:57.Google Scholar