Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:22:16.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive Interactions of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Wild Oats (Avena fatua) Grown at Different Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David W. Cudney ,
Lowell S. Jordan ,
Jodie S. Holt  and
John S. Reints
David W. Cudney
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sciences, Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Lowell S. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sciences, Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Jodie S. Holt
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sciences, Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
John S. Reints
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sciences, Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competitive interactions of wheat and wild oats in relation to variations in plant density of both species were investigated in field studies under irrigation and added fertilizer. Competition studies included comparisons by both additive and replacement series. The additive series was used to study plant responses to competition under fixed density of wheat and increasing density of wild oats. The replacement series was used to study plant responses to competition under constant total plant density with differing proportions of wheat and wild oats. On a per plant basis, shoot dry weight and leaf area index of wild oats were less than those of wheat at anthesis. However, the replacement series experiment indicated that wheat and wild oats were equivalent in competitiveness. Relative density of wild oats gave a better regression fit for wheat yield than did absolute wild oats density (r2 values of 0.83 and 0.61, respectively). Yield of wheat grain was linearly proportional to relative density of wild oats.

Keywords

Wild oats, Avena fatua L. ♯3 AVEFAwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Anza.’InterferencedensityAVEFA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , July 1989 , pp. 538 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackman, G. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. Agric. Sci. 28:247–271.Google Scholar
2. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.Google Scholar
3. Dew, D. A. 1972. An index of competition for estimating crop loss due to weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:921–927.Google Scholar
4. Hamman, W. H. 1979. Field conformation of an index for predicting yield loss of wheat and barley due to wild oat competition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:243–244.Google Scholar
5. Harper, J. L. 1977. The Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London. 892 pp.Google Scholar
6. Martin, M. P., Field, L. D., and Field, R. J. 1987. Competition between plants of wild oat (Avena fatua) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Res. 27:119–124.Google Scholar
7. Martin, R. J., Cullis, B. R., and McNamara, D. W. 1987. Prediction of wheat loss due to competition by wild oat (Avena spp.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38:487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. McGilchrist, C. A. and Trenbath, B. R. 1971. A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27:659–671.Google Scholar
9. Potter, J. R. and Jones, J. W. 1977. Leaf partitioning as an important factor in growth. Plant Physiol. 59:10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190–198.Google Scholar
11. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 265 pp.Google Scholar
12. Willey, R. W. and Rao, M. R. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Expl. Agric. 16:117–125.Google Scholar