Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:08:11.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive Effects of Sicklepod on Lima Beans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Norman C. Glaze  and
Ben G. Mullinix Jr.
Norman C. Glaze
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Ben G. Mullinix Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯ CASOB) was planted at six densities (0 to 39.4/m2) and six durations of competition (0 to 10 weeks after seeding) in lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L. cv. ‘Jackson Wonder’). The yield of green lima beans was inversely proportional to the density of sicklepod. In general, weed densities at 2.7 to 10.8 sicklepod/m2 did not significantly reduce yields, but higher populations frequently did. The average yields generally decreased if the duration of competition exceeded six weeks.

Keywords

Cassia obtusifoliaPhaseolus lunatusCASOB
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McLaughlin, R. D. 1977. Competition of prickly sida with cotton. Weed Sci. 25:106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:258–262.Google Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A. and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 28:401–409.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Influence of time of planting and distance from the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) row of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on competitiveness with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:568–572.Google Scholar
8. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
9. Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1978. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26:484–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., and Ethredge, W. J. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts. I. Weed-free maintenance and weed competition. Weed Sci. 23:368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:327–329.Google Scholar
12. Robinson, E. L. 1976. Effect of weed species and placement on seed cotton yields. Weed Sci. 24:353–355.Google Scholar
13. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:32–37.Google Scholar
14. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar