Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:47:05.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive Effects of Annual Weeds on Spanish Peanuts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. V. Hill  and
P. W. Santelmann
L. V. Hill
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Oklahoma Agr. Exp. Sta., Stillwater
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Oklahoma Agr. Exp. Sta., Stillwater
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yields were not influenced by weeds that were removed within 3 weeks after planting and each week thereafter, but a yield reduction did occur when weeds were not removed until 4 to 8 weeks after planting. Peanuts kept weed free at least 6 weeks after planting showed no yield loss due to competition from weeds emerging later. As weed competition increases, peanut seed yield, forage yield, and soil moisture content decreases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Donald, C. M. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Australin J. Agr. Res. 9:421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybeans stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., N. Y. 481 p.Google Scholar