Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:37:02.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive Ability of Winter Wheat Cultivars with Wild Oat (Avena ludoviciana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. S. Balyan ,
R. K. Malik ,
R. S. Panwar  and
S. Singh
R. S. Balyan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar-125004 India
R. K. Malik
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar-125004 India
R. S. Panwar
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar-125004 India
S. Singh
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar-125004 India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during the winters of 1986–87 and 1987–88 at Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India to classify the ability of winter wheat cultivars to compete with wild oat. Wild oat reduced winter wheat grain yield by 17 to 62% depending upon cultivar. WH-147 and HD-2285 were the most competitive cultivars. Winter wheat dry matter accumulation and grain yield were negatively correlated with wild oat dry matter. A high number of tillers, particularly in HD-2009, WH-291, and S-308, did not always translate into grain yield advantage in wild oat-infested plots. Wheat height and dry matter accumulation per unit area during early crop growth were better characters than number of tillers for predicting the competitive ability of wheat cultivars to wild oat.

Keywords

Isoproturon, N′-(4-isopropylphenyl)-N,N-dimethyl ureawild oat, Avena ludoviciana Durieu # AVELUwheat, Triticum aestivum (L.) ‘HD-2009’, ‘HD-2285’, ‘S-308’, ‘WH-291’, and ‘WH-147’Interferenceweed suppressionAVELU
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 154 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, B. 1983. Competition between cereal varieties and weeds. Mordisk Jordbrugsforskning 65:268.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous 1987. Influence of date of planting and herbicides on the competition and control of weeds in wheat Seasonal Report Nat. Agric. Res. Project on Weed Control. Page 20.Google Scholar
3. Appleby, A. P., Olson, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Balyan, R. S., Bhan, V. W., and Malik, R. K. 1988. Effect of herbicides and crop rotation of weed complex. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 18:100–107.Google Scholar
5. Balyan, R. S. and Malik, R. K. 1989. Wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum): Effect of nitrogen fertilization. Seasonal Rep. of Res. Projects Agro. 2 and 4 on weed control. Page 31.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1972. Competitiveness and herbicide tolerance of sorghum hybrids. Weed Sci. 20:314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1986. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat. Effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Challaiah, R. E., Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jennings, P. L. and Aquino, R. C. 1968. Studies on competition in rice III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution. 22:529–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Leather, G. R. 1983. Sunflower (Helianthus annus) are allelopathic to weeds. Weed Sci. 31:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Bhan, V. M. 1988. Effect of surfactants on the efficacy of some post-emergence grass herbicides. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 18:278–283.Google Scholar
13. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Page 592–593 in Panse, V. G., ed. ICAR. New Delhi.Google Scholar
14. Steinsick, J. W., Oliver, L. R., and Collins, F. C. 1982. Allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw on selected weed species. Weed Sci. 30:495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Swan, D. G. and Furtick, W. R. 1962. Competition of fiddleneck with wheat. Weed Sci. 10:121–123.Google Scholar