Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:04:39.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of Wild Oat in Wheat and Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Allyn R. Bell  and
John D. Nalewaja
Allyn R. Bell
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, North Dakota State University, Fargo
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, North Dakota State University, Fargo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) competition increased the losses in yield of both wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with increased densities of seedlings. At Fargo in 1965, wild oat densities of 70 and 160 seedlings/sq yd reduced the wheat yield 22.1% and 39.1%, respectively, compared to the wild oat-free check. Similar wild oat densities reduced the barley yield 6.5% and 25.9%, respectively. The addition of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer reduced the yield loss caused by wild oat 2 out of 3 years of the experiment. Although a considerable yield reduction occurred in barley and wheat, percent protein and seed size were not influenced noticeably.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis. (9th Ed.) The Association, Washington, D.C. 832 p.Google Scholar
2. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oat in flax. Weeds 16:501–504.Google Scholar
3. Blackman, G. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of the competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. Agr. Sci. 28:247–271.Google Scholar
4. Burrows, V. D. and Olson, P. J. 1955. Reaction of small grains to various densities of wild mustard and the results obtained after removal with 2,4-D or by hand. I. Experiment with wheat. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 35:68–75.Google Scholar
5. Friesen, G., Shebeski, L. H., and Robinson, A. D. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. II. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 40:652–658.Google Scholar
6. Friesen, H. A. 1960. Field scale trial with avadex and barban for the selective control of wild oats in wheat. Weed Comm. Can., West Sec. Res. Rpts:32–33.Google Scholar
7. Harris, R. H. 1938. Factors which influence the protein of hard red spring wheat. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimo. Bull. 1:10–12.Google Scholar
8. Hopkins, J. W. 1935. Influence of weather conditions on the nitrogen content of wheat. Can. J. Res. 12:228–237.Google Scholar
9. Paull, A. E. and Anderson, A. J. 1942. The effects of amount and distribution of rainfall on the protein content of western Canadian wheat. Can. J. Res. 20:212–227.Google Scholar
10. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. J. Res. 10:77–94.Google Scholar
11. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crops in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agr. 16:151–160.Google Scholar
12. Robbins, W. W., Crafts, A. S., and Raynor, R. N. 1952. Ecology of weeds, p. 51–73. In Robbins, W. W., Crafts, A. S., and Raynor, R. N., Weed Control. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, N.Y. Google Scholar
13 Selleck, G. W. and Althaus, R. E. 1960. Avadex for wild oat control in barley in North Dakota. Proc. NCWCC 17:93.Google Scholar
14. Sexsmith, J. J. and Russel, C. G. 1963. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on wild oats and spring wheat. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 43:64–70.Google Scholar
15. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of cultivated cereals with various nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of Biol. 47:716–739.Google Scholar