Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:53:15.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competition Between Kochia and Sugarbeets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. M. Weatherspoon
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr. in cooperation with the Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
E. E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr. in cooperation with the Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Abstract

In a 2-year study, kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] competed with sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.) for various periods after emergence. Kochia then was removed and plants that emerged subsequently were controlled by hand-weeding. Yield of sugarbeet roots was reduced when kochia competed for more than 5 or 6 weeks. Kochia that competed with sugarbeets for the entire season reduced yields more than 95%. In another study, kochia was controlled by frequent hand-weeding for different periods after sugarbeet emergence. When kochia was controlled initially for 3 to 4 weeks, yield of sugarbeets was not reduced. Some kochia emerged following the 3 to 4 weeks of hand-weeding. However, competition from sugarbeets reduced the weight of this kochia at harvest by 59 and 92%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1965. Losses in agriculture, p. 58. U. S. Dep. of Agr. Agricultural Handbook No. 291. 120 p.Google Scholar
2. Brimhall, Phil B., Chamberlain, Earl W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competition of annual weeds and sugarbeets. Weeds 13:3335.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204207.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206208.Google Scholar
5. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245249.Google Scholar
6. Donald, C. M. 1961. Competition for light in crops and pastures. p. 282313. In Mechanisms in Biological Competition. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symposia 15. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331334.Google Scholar
8. Moolani, Moti K. and Slife, F. W. 1960. The competitive effects of various intensities of pigweed on the development of corn and soybeans. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 17:2627.Google Scholar
9. Shadbolt, C. A. and Holm, L. G. 1956. Some quantitative aspects of weed competition in vegetable crops. Weeds 4:111123.Google Scholar
10. Staniforth, David W. and Weber, Charles R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Staniforth, David W. 1957. Effects of annual grass weeds on the yield of corn. Agron. J. 49:551555.Google Scholar
12. Stevens, O. A. 1965. North Dakota Research Weed Development Notes. North Dakota Res. Rep. No. 1. 8 p.Google Scholar
13. Weber, Charles R. and Staniforth, David W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440444.Google Scholar
14. Williams, J. T. 1964. A study of the competitive ability of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 4:283295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morning glory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:4951.Google Scholar
16. Zimdahl, Robert L. and Fertig, Stanford N. 1967. Influence of weed competition on sugarbeets. Weeds 15:336339.Google Scholar